Business Dual € 100 stick vacuum cleaners: Candy CAS10 vs...

Dual € 100 stick vacuum cleaners: Candy CAS10 vs Proscenic P8

7

Because everyone does not necessarily have the means or the desire to spend € 649 for a brand new Dyson V11 Extra, our duel of the day pits two stick vacuum cleaners for € 100: the Candy CAS10 and the Proscenic P8.

Characteristics

Proscenic P8 Candy CAS10
Type of stick vacuum Stick Stick
Filter type HEPA, Cyclonic HEPA, Cyclonic, Foam
Replaceable battery removable removable
Operating mode light switch light switch
Storage base to fix on the wall base to fix on the wall
Accessory (s) provided brush, motorized brush, mini-brush, nozzle, furniture and textiles brush brush, crevice
Additional options turbo mode, charge indicator charge indicator
Weight 2.5 kg 2.3 kg
Sound level 75 dB NC
Autonomy announced 35 mins 25 mins
Filling capacity 1 L 0.7 L
Battery Type Li-ion Li-ion
Power 22 V


The forces involved

There are many reasons to want to get a stick-type stick vacuum cleaner: first purchase, replacement, willingness to get a backup device … However, “cheap” does not rhymes not necessarily with “bad product” as we showed the Candy CAS10 and the Proscenic P8. We find these two references at less than 100 €, but they were able to convince us and show enough qualities to get a satisfactory score of 3 stars during our tests. Between the two, which one to choose?

Convenience of use: Proscenic P8

One thing is certain: it is not because of their designs that we choose the CAS10 or the Proscenic P8. But the main thing is not there and both seem to be made of materials strong enough not to fall apart after a few uses. It is not their respective weights in suction mode on the ground (2.3 kg for the Proscenic, 2.12 kg for the Candy) that will decide in favor of one or the other. However, the Candy CAS10 seemed a little more maneuverable than its challenger of the day.

The Candy CAS10 on the left, the Proscenic P8 on the right.

The Candy CAS10 on the left, the Proscenic P8 on the right.

The handling differs from one model to another. The P8 uses a trigger switch: a first press starts a continuous suction and a second stops it. The CAS10 is also equipped with a trigger, but it must be kept pressed for the device to work; this makes it possible to extend the range since the engine is no longer used as soon as the handle is released, to move a piece of furniture for example. On the flip side, this system can tire the index in the long run. To overcome this problem, Candy has provided an ingenious latch to block the trigger.

The Candy CAS10 can be used in continuous suction mode, or sequenced.

The Candy CAS10 can be used in continuous suction mode, or sequenced.

Another difference, the CAS10 has only one suction power, while the P8 is a little more versatile with its two levels. This makes it possible to adapt to the surfaces to be cleaned as well as to the quantity of waste to be collected. In addition, the Taiwanese reveals an assessment of autonomy thanks to a trio of LEDs, while you have to be satisfied with a single diode (which flashes once the battery at a certain level) in the Italian.

The Proscenic P8 (right) has three LEDs to indicate the battery level.

The Proscenic P8 (right) has three LEDs to indicate the battery level.

Both of our competitors benefit from a removable battery, which, theoretically, should make it possible to have a backup battery to extend the cleaning session if necessary. However, if this possibility actually exists at Proscenic (the battery accommodates a female socket to connect it), this is not the case at Candy. Surprisingly enough, the CAS10 battery has no socket to connect the transformer and, de facto, only recharges when plugged into the vacuum cleaner. It is not possible to carry out this operation when it is extracted from its housing; a strange choice from Candy.

Cannot charge the Candy CAS10 battery (right) when it is out of its housing.

Cannot charge the Candy CAS10 battery (right) when it is out of its housing.

Stick-type stick vacuums like our two competitors need a base to store them efficiently. Often this must be fixed to the wall using screws and dowels and this is the case here. Another common point, these wall bases are not equipped with connectors and it will therefore be necessary to connect the CAS10 and the P8 after placing them there to charge: draw on this side therefore.

At such a price point, you should not expect to find many accessories. The Candy CAS10 is delivered with a long nozzle and a flexible nozzle (but without mini brush) while the P8 is equipped with a mini round brush and a flat nozzle. In either case, we are a little hungry.

The CAS10 accessories at the top and the P8 accessories at the bottom.

The CAS10 accessories at the top and the P8 accessories at the bottom.

With its better designed battery, two levels of suction power and a more precise autonomy indicator, the Proscenic P8 wins the first point.

Suction: Candy CAS10

Our two competitors were quite comfortable in this area.

Note, however, that the Proscenic P8 appeared to be more in difficulty on long pile carpets since after 2 minutes of effort, at maximum power, it recovered only 64% of the grains of rice that we scattered. It is better than a good number of stick vacuums in our comparison, but it is less good than the CAS10 which picked up 92% under the same conditions.

On fine carpets, the results are better for both vacuum cleaners and it only takes a minute to remove all the waste. Note that this result is obtained thanks to the maximum power of the Proscenic P8.

Finally, it is on hard ground that we obtain the best results, in one case as in the other. Candy swallows 99% of the rice in 30 seconds and 100% in one minute; a performance very similar to that of the Proscenic P8 (98% efficiency in 30 seconds, all in one minute) regardless of the power level chosen.

Despite its unique suction power, the Candy CAS10 wins this round thanks to better results on long pile carpets.

Maintenance: Proscenic P8

Emptying the Candy Cas10 and the Proscenic P9 requires pressing a button at the base of the waste collector. The articulated bottom then opens and the trash is discharged into the trash: simple, fast, hygienic.

No difference in terms of waste disposal.

No difference in terms of waste disposal.

The maintenance of the rotating brush is also the same on both devices. It is enough to handle a small plastic part placed under the suction head in order to free it from its housing to remove the hairs and long hair which could be tangled there. Refitting is no more complicated.

The dismantled filtration systems of P8 (left) and CAS10 (right).

The dismantled filtration systems of P8 (left) and CAS10 (right).

Despite their low prices, our two stick vacuum cleaners benefit from perfect filtration since the HEPA filters of the two devices did not gain weight after we had them ingested 20 grams of cocoa powder. This means that the dust is not released into the air during the cleaning session, which would annihilate any desire for cleanliness of course. However, the Candy CAS10 seemed a little more dirty than its counterpart. And even if the maintenance of the filters is not really a problem, as it is simple to disassemble the Candy model (just like the Proscenic P8 by the way), it will have to be more regularly maintained.

This last point allows the Proscenic P8 to win.

Autonomy: Proscenic P8

The maximum usage time of the Candy CAS10 (23 min 10 s) corresponds to that of the Proscenic P8 used to the maximum of these capacities (23 min 30 s). The latter can nevertheless hold 31 min 15 s at the minimum suction power.

On the other hand, the recharge of the Italian battery is twice as fast as that of the Taiwanese: 2 h 3 min against 3 h 55 min.

It is therefore very difficult to decide between the two, but the Proscenic being more enduring, it is up to him that this round returns.

Noise: Proscenic P8

Even when used at full power, the Proscenic P8 is more discreet than the Candy CAS10. Its sound level reaches “only” 74 dB (A), against 76 dB (A) for its competitor. To be completely complete, the noise of the P8 does not exceed 71 dB (A) at the minimum power.

The last point is therefore awarded without any possible dispute to the Proscenic P9.

Verdict: Proscenic P8

It was ultimately an unquestionable victory for the Proscenic P8, which proved to be more enduring and quieter than its competitor. Of course, Candy’s stick vacuum cleaner proves to be more effective on long pile carpets, but this advantage is not enough in the face of its rival whose handling is better thought out; one thinks in particular of the detachable battery provided with female socket of P8, which is not the case on CAS10.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest news

Maulino entrepreneurs wear traditional products on the Internet

The Maule entrepreneurs who are part of the Fonda FOSIS have registered blue numbers on their sales and have...

Tourism Innovation Summit abre candidaturas para Touristech Startup Fest

TIS, Tourism Innovation Summit, will design the first world atlas of tourism Startups and its first meeting will be...

Coronavirus: regret for the death of the director of the Private Hospital, Gerardo Amuchástegui

Gerardo Amuchástegui, the general director of the Private Hospital, died this Saturday in Córdoba affected by Covid-19. From the...

GROUP BY GROUP | Results, positions and all the information after date 4 of the Copa Libertadores

The CONMEBOL Libertadores Cup, coveted by all. | Manuel Velasquez / Getty ImagesAfter six months of standing...

The best-selling mobile of the year is from Samsung and today it costs 100 euros less

One of the most popular mid-range of the year lowers its price by 100 euros. He Samsung Galaxy A51, one...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you