The eye as a mirror of the soul and beyond. It would be enough to look a person in the eye to understand if this has health problems. Or genetic predispositions.
This is the premise on which iridology is based. That is, the study of the iris intended to derive the state of health of the organism from the structure, color and intensity of the iris itself (definition Braids).
The iris, that is the colored part of the eye, is analyzed through the iridological examination. With a very powerful magnifying glass, the iridoscope, the small details of the iris are highlighted.
The starting idea is that the iris acts as a graphic representation of the human body. Including organs and glands. As well as bone structures and joints.
But is it true that it is enough to look a person in the eye to understand if he has a disease?
Spots, particular signs, texture, color and small anomalies or chromatic changes of the iris are examined by the iridologist.
Both eyes are observed in the examination. And this is because each of them would give information on different parts of the body present on the right or left side.
A very old argument
Even the most ancient civilizations were convinced of the possibility that the observation of the iris could reveal important details about the health of the individual.
The eye, in fact, was a fundamental symbol in Egyptian culture. And even some Mesopotamian texts refer to a link between chromatic variations of the iris and the onset of illnesses.
When it comes to this matter, one cannot fail to mention Bernard Jensen, known for having created one of the most famous maps of the iris.
Supporters and critics of the theory
In conclusion, is it true that it is enough to look a person in the eye to understand if he has a disease?
There are more answers to this question. Iridology boasts many supporters and just as many critics.
The main doubts come from the doctors. These argue that the iris of the human eye is stable. It is therefore independent of organ problems. Or anyway from other anatomical structures. Otherwise, supporters argue the exact opposite.
(We remind you to carefully read the warnings regarding this article, which can be consulted who”)