Vox denounces that the Congress Table will give a million euros to the ERC and Junts groups

by archynewsy
0 comment

They have been the first to apply officially. Through a text addressed to the Congress Table, Vox has asked to annul the formation of ERC and Junts as parliamentary groups. In the letter, signed by his spokesman in the Lower House, Pepa Millanthe formation requires the governing body of Parliament to agree, as a consequence, the suspension of economic remuneration and return of material resources for “having committed a fraud of the law and a violation of the Regulations of the Chamber”.

In this sense, Vox points out that the Cortes Generales would be “financing” those who swore or promised “for the coup acts of October 1, 2017.” A grant that the party estimates at 1,021,676 euros per year -in 2023- and has pointed out as “a fraudulent and uncontrolled squandering of public money”.

Within the claim, he requests that he withdraw the fixed and variable funds that ERC and Junts will pocket as parliamentary groups when “having been constituted illegally and fraudulentlyand that their competent representatives have not acquired the status of Deputies to the not have complied with the ConstitutionWith regard to the changing part, as well as the human resources that they may receive, he requests to suspend it until they are incorporated into the mixed group and once they have “solemnly” complied with the Magna Carta.

On the other hand, the claims of the force that has 33 deputies not only order the withdrawal of the economic amount to ERC and Junts. It also demands that Bildu not perceive 489.844 euros not having its deputies complied with the Constitution. It adds that this must be done in accordance with the articles 4 and 20 of the Rules of the Chamber.

To support these demands, the party uses two arguments: the assignment of parliamentarians by the PSOE and Sumar and that the independentista deputies did not carry out a “valid compliance” with the Constitution. Regarding the first, they point out that it “clearly” infringes the article 23.2 of the Regulations of the Chamber, while the second, he indicates, supposed the “perpetration of a fraud of law”.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment