Okay, here’s a breakdown of the claims made in the text, verified against the timeline (January 2026 looking back at 2025), and a summary of the author’s overall argument. I’ll categorize it for clarity.
Overall Argument: The author is strongly debunking predictions made by P.Andrejevs and K. Daragan in a December 2024 broadcast regarding events in 2025. The author argues these predictions were demonstrably false and highlights the disconnect between the predictions and reality, especially concerning currency changes, the political stability of Europe, the fate of Ukraine, and the situation of Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The author suggests these “predictors” are either delusional or motivated by Russian propaganda.
I.P.Andrejevs’ Predictions (December 2024) & 2025 Reality
* Claim 1 (21st minute): Uranus entering Vërš (Taurus) would change the world of currency in 2025.
* Verification: FALSE. The text explicitly states “At the moment, in January 2026, there is no trace of what…said…that ‘from Vërš…incoming Uranus…will change the world of currency as we know it’.” No significant, globally disruptive currency change occurred in 2025.
* Claim 2 (35th minute): A collapse of the economy and politics in Europe would occur in June 2025, triggered by elections. The Euro would be destabilized,and travel to Europe would become hazardous (“your head is already at the airport will cut”).
* Verification: FALSE. The text states this didn’t happen. While Europe faced economic and political challenges in 2025 (as it often does), there was no widespread collapse, the Euro remained stable, and travel was not demonstrably more dangerous. The author uses strong language (“raves,” “person risked and lost…moving to psychiatry”) to dismiss this prediction.
* Claim 3 (36th minute): ukraine would cease to exist as an independent country by the end of June 2025.Its territory would be occupied by a “Western Army” (presumably implying Russia), with some territory returned to the west and the east legally formalized under Russian control.
* Verification: FALSE. Ukraine continued to exist as an independent nation throughout 2025, and the scenario described did not materialize. The author emphasizes this by stating, “Should it be confirmed that nothing like that happened in April, May, June, or july 2025…”
II. K. Daragan’s Predictions (December 2024) & 2025/2026 Reality
* Claim 4 (48th minute): Volodymyr Zelenskyy would likely escape or be forced to resign in 2025, potentially due to violence.
* Verification: FALSE. Zelenskyy remained in office and continued to lead Ukraine throughout 2025 and into January 2026, even appearing at the Davos forum. His presence at Davos is presented as direct evidence against this prediction.
* Claim 5 (2022 prediction, referenced): Zelenskyy’s astrological chart indicated a lack of optimism for the next two (later extended to three) years due to a Sun/Mars opposition in Leo.
* Verification: FALSE (in its implication). while the author acknowledges Zelenskyy faced immense challenges,Ukraine did resist the Russian invasion,and Zelenskyy maintained his position. The author argues that Zelenskyy’s success despite the astrological forecast undermines the predictive power of Daragan’s astrology. The author points out that the predicted timeframe has passed.
* Claim 6 (Implied): Daragan’s predictions are influenced by Russian funding and propaganda.
* Verification: unverified. The author suggests this (“the money paid by the fund named after the Russian dictator Putin must be processed!”) but provides no concrete evidence. This is an accusation, not a verified fact.
III. Author’s Additional Points & Criticisms
* Astrological Skill: The author questions Daragan’s competence in astrological prediction, suggesting he doesn’t understand the different techniques for predicting individual vs. collective events.
* Zelenskyy’s resilience: The author emphasizes the improbability of Zelenskyy surviving politically and physically given the circumstances, framing his continued leadership as