A Nevada state judge dismissed a criminal case on Thursday against six Republicans accused of submitting a certificate falsely declaring Donald Trump the winner of the state’s 2020 electoral votes, according to court records reported by the Associated Press. District Judge Mary Kay Holthus ruled that prosecutors failed to prove the defendants intended to deceive government officials and noted the state did not disclose exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.
Dismissal of the Nevada Republican Electors Case
The ruling by Judge Holthus marks the latest setback for prosecutors across swing states attempting to penalize alternative electors who submitted documents for Trump following the 2020 presidential election. Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford brought charges of forgery and offering a false instrument for filing or record against the six defendants, who all pleaded not guilty. According to the Associated Press, the state’s attorney general office plans to appeal the decision.
The defendants named in the case include Michael McDonald, chair of the Nevada Republican Party, and Jesse Law, former chair of the Clark County Republican Party. Following the November 2020 election, in which Joe Biden won Nevada by more than 30,000 votes, the six individuals gathered outside the Nevada Legislature to sign a certificate directing the state’s six electoral votes to Trump. That ceremony was broadcast online, and prosecutors utilized the video footage as evidence.
Legal Arguments and the Question of Intent
The core of the courtroom battle centered on whether the defendants acted with fraudulent intent. Prosecutors argued the group intended for their documents to be mistaken for official electoral votes that former Vice President Mike Pence would count during Congress’s certification on January 6, 2021.
Conversely, defense attorneys maintained that the certificate-signing ceremony was an act of political theater designed to publicize concerns about the election and preserve their legal rights to challenge the official results. They contended there was no attempt to deceive a government agency into accepting the GOP document as genuine.
Judge Holthus agreed with the defense’s position regarding intent. In her written ruling, she stated that the defendants openly announced both their actions and their asserted purpose rather than concealing their conduct. She found that this transparency weighed against a reasonable inference of fraudulent intent. Furthermore, the judge pointed to the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence during the grand jury proceedings.
Broader Legal Landscape Across Swing States
The dismissal in Nevada aligns with the outcomes of similar prosecutions in other swing states. According to the Associated Press, cases brought against alternative electors in Arizona, Michigan, and Georgia have also been dismissed or dropped. In Arizona, Attorney General Kris Mayes recently dismissed a criminal case to navigate a grand jury deadline after losing an appeal, though she vowed to bring the matter back before a new grand jury.
Federal efforts faced a similar trajectory when a special prosecutor dropped a federal case in late 2024 charging Trump with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, following Trump’s victory over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris. Meanwhile, legal proceedings involving alternative electors remain active in Wisconsin.
Related reading