Prince Harry and six other high-profile claimants have been ordered by the High Court to make an initial cost payment of £9.5m to Associated Newspapers Limited, the publisher of the Daily Mail, following the dismissal of their privacy lawsuit. According to High Court documents and reporting by the BBC and The Guardian, the claimants must settle this initial figure by August 28, and they could ultimately face total legal bills of up to £34.5m as part of an indemnity costs ruling handed down by Mr Justice Nicklin.
High Court Ruling and Cost Breakdown
The legal battle centers on a failed privacy claim brought by Prince Harry, Sir Elton John, his husband David Furnish, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Liz Hurley, Sadie Frost, and former MP Sir Simon Hughes. According to court filings reported by Sky News, the group sued Associated Newspapers over allegations of unlawful information-gathering. On July 7, Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the claims, stating that the public figures failed to prove their allegations.
Following the dismissal, the judge ruled that the publisher’s legal costs should be determined on an indemnity basis, which heavily favors the newspaper group in cost recovery. While the claimants held insurance policies covering up to £16.2m of Associated Newspapers’ defense costs, Friday’s ruling leaves the Duke of Sussex and his co-claimants potentially exposed to an additional £18m, pushing total potential liabilities to £34.5m.
Judicial Critique of Unwithdrawn Allegations
Mr Justice Nicklin described the potential £34.5m total cost demand as “excessive” on its face, noting that the final expenses may not ultimately reach that ceiling. However, according to ITVX, the judge declined to impose a formal cap on the publisher’s recoverable costs, stating that a ceiling would be “too broad brushed, would risk unfairness, and would be vulnerable to the charge that it was arbitrary.”
The judge highlighted that the claimants failed to voluntarily withdraw serious allegations during the proceedings, including claims that top executives from the media group had lied to the Leveson public inquiry. Mr Justice Nicklin stated in his ruling, according to AOL, that leaving such serious accusations hanging without a proper evidential basis was “unreasonable to a high degree” and not a disciplined way to handle litigation.
Next Steps and Potential Appeals
Associated Newspapers released a statement characterizing the ruling as a “devastating critique of an attempt to destroy a newspaper and the reputations of its journalists, editors and executives.” Meanwhile, according to BBC reporting, Sir Simon Hughes expressed disappointment with the judgment and confirmed he is reviewing the documents to determine whether to pursue an appeal.
Prince Harry and the other six claimants have until October 2 to formally launch an appeal against the substantive judgment or the costs order. The initial £9.5m interim payment must be deposited by August 28.
Worth a look