The second-to-fourth digit ratio, known as 2D:4D, does not reliably predict how men behave toward women, according to subsequent scientific investigations that challenge a widely publicized 2015 behavioral study. The measurement compares the length of the index finger to the ring finger and has long been investigated as an indirect marker of prenatal exposure to sex hormones such as testosterone.
While average 2D:4D ratios are slightly lower in men than in women, researchers have debated whether this anatomical trait carries meaningful psychological or behavioral insights. Recent evaluations and replication attempts indicate that finger length measurements do not serve as a dependable indicator of individual hormone exposure or social behavior.
Origins of the 2015 Digit Ratio Claim
In 2015, a study published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences reported a correlation between finger ratios and social behavior. Researchers asked 155 participants to log social interactions lasting longer than five minutes over a 20-day period, recording specific agreeable or quarrelsome behaviors.
The study found that men with smaller digit ratios—meaning a shorter index finger relative to the ring finger—reported roughly one-third more agreeable behaviors and one-third fewer quarrelsome behaviors during interactions with women compared to men with larger ratios. Debbie Moskowitz, lead author and Professor of Psychology at McGill, stated at the time that men with smaller ratios were more likely to listen attentively, smile, laugh, compromise, or offer compliments when interacting with women.
However, the 2015 research was strictly observational. The authors did not manipulate prenatal hormones, meaning the study identified a correlation rather than proving that prenatal testosterone directly caused the observed behavioral differences.
Replication Failures and Broader Evidence
Subsequent scientific efforts have struggled to confirm these initial findings. In 2021, researchers Michelle Spix and Marije aan het Rot published a replication study tracking everyday social interactions. They found that while male participants generally behaved more agreeably toward women than toward men, this behavior did not depend significantly on their 2D:4D ratios.
The authors of the 2021 replication noted that their sample size included 81 participants with relatively few men, leaving open the possibility that this contributed to the differing outcome. Even so, other investigations have failed to validate the predictive value of digit ratios.
A 2019 study involving 560 participants playing economic games with real money found no strong relationship between 2D:4D and generosity, bargaining, trust, reciprocity, or punishment. A comprehensive 2024 meta-analysis also found no overall relationship between digit ratios and prenatal testosterone levels across the multiple studies examined.
Current Scientific Standing of 2D:4D
Discussions regarding the biological significance of digit ratios remain ongoing within the scientific community. A 2025 commentary published in Hormones and Behavior defended right-hand 2D:4D as the best available non-invasive retrospective indicator of prenatal androgen exposure in humans.
Despite ongoing debates over whether finger length patterns reflect early hormonal environments, current evidence does not support using 2D:4D as a reliable tool for determining individual hormone levels or predicting whether a specific man will be kind or quarrelsome toward women.
Related reading