Accessibility Non-compliant Crédit Agricole Alsace Vosges

Crédit Agricole Crédit Agricole Alsace Vosges undertakes to make its recruitment site accessible in accordance with article 47 of law no. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005.

To this end, it implements the following strategy and actions:

This accessibility statement applies to Crédit Agricole Alsace Vosges

STATUS OF CONFORMITY

Crédit Agricole Alsace Vosges – is not in compliance with the general accessibility improvement framework (RGAA), version 4.1.2.

TEST RESULTS

The compliance audit carried out by InfoGreen Factory reveals that:

Number of applicable criteria: 70

Number of compliant criteria: 23

Number of non-compliant criteria: 47

NON-ACCESSIBLE CONTENT

The content listed below is not accessible for the following reasons:

NON-COMPLIANCE

1. Images

2. Frames

3. Colors

• 3.1 – Certain Information is given only by color

• 3.2 – Some contrast ratios between the color of the text and its background are not high enough.

• 3.3 – Certain contrast ratios on interface components or graphic elements carrying information are not sufficient.

4. Multimedia

• 4.1 – Some media do not have text transcription or audio description (except in special cases)

• 4.2 – Some pre-recorded media do not have a textual transcription or synchronized audio description.

• 4.3 – Some pre-recorded media do not have synchronized subtitles

• 4.4 – Some pre-recorded media do not have relevant synchronized subtitles

• 4.5 – Some pre-recorded media do not have synchronized audio description (except in special cases)

• 4.6 – Some pre-recorded media do not have relevant synchronized audio description (except in special cases)

5. Tableaux

6. Liens

7. Scripts

• 7.3 – Certain scripted elements cannot be controlled by the keyboard and a pointing device.

• 7.4 – Certain scripts which initiate a context change do not have an alert system for the user or give them control

8. Mandatory elements

• 8.7 – Some language changes are not indicated in the source code (except in special cases)

• 8.9 – Some tags are not used solely for presentation purposes.

9. Structuring of information

• 9.1 – Some information is not structured with appropriate titles.

• 9.2 – Certain structures of the document are not consistent (except in special cases)

• 9.3 – Some lists of elements are not correctly structured.

10. Presentation of information

• 10.1 – Some style sheets to control the presentation of information are missing.

• 10.2 – Visible content carrying information does not remain present when style sheets are deactivated on certain pages.

• 10.3 – Information is no longer understandable when style sheets are deactivated on certain pages.

• 10.4 – Text is no longer readable when the character size is increased up to 200%, at least on some pages.

• 10.5 – Some CSS declarations of element background colors and fonts are not used correctly

• 10.6 – Certain links whose nature is not obvious are not visible in relation to the surrounding text.

• 10.7 – Some elements do not have a visible focus hold.

• 10.11 – Certain content is not presented without loss of functionality information and without resorting to either vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256 px, or horizontal scrolling for a window with a width of 320 px (except in special cases)

• 10.12 – Certain text spacing properties cannot be redefined by the user without loss of content or functionality (except in special cases)

11. Forms

• 11.5 – Certain fields of the same nature are not grouped together even though this is necessary

• 11.6 – Certain groupings of fields of the same nature do not have legends

• 11.7 – Legends associated with a grouping of fields of the same nature are not relevant.

• 11.8 – Certain items of the same nature on a list of choices are not grouped in a relevant manner

• 11.9 – Some button labels are irrelevant.

• 11.10 – Some input controls are not used appropriately.

• 11.11 – Some entry errors are not accompanied by suggestions facilitating correction.

12. Navigation

• 12.1 – Certain sets of pages do not have two different navigation systems, at least (except in special cases)

• 12.6 – Certain content grouping areas present in several web pages (header, main navigation, main content, footer and search engine areas) cannot be reached or avoided

• 12.7 – In certain web pages, do not have an avoidance link or quick access to the main content area (except in special cases)

• 12.8 – Tab order is inconsistent.

• 12.9 – In certain pages, the navigation may contain a keyboard trap.

13. Consultation

• 13.6 – In certain web pages, for each cryptic content (ASCII art, emoticon, cryptic syntax) has an irrelevant alternative

• 13.9 – In certain web pages, the content offered cannot be consulted regardless of the orientation of the screen (portrait or landscape) (except in special cases)

Note regarding the validity of the generated source code

The generated source code of the site pages is not completely valid depending on the specified document type.

However, for the reasons mentioned below, criterion 8.2 of the RGAA corresponding to this point has been marked as compliant.

Officially, criterion 4.1.1 of the WCAG relating to this criterion 8.2 of the RGAA has been deleted from WCAG 2.2 and must be considered as still satisfied with regard to WCAG 2.1 as well as the European standard EN 301 549.

In practice, this criterion no longer has any benefit for accessibility for disabled people. Possible accessibility problems emanating from the non-validity of the generated source code being covered by other criteria of the RGAA.

EXEMPTION FOR DISPROPORTIONATE BURDEN

CONTENT NOT SUBJECT TO THE ACCESSIBILITY OBLIGATION

ESTABLISHMENT OF THIS ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT

This declaration was established on 02/02/2026

TECHNOLOGIES USED FOR THE CREATION OF THE SITE

TEST ENVIRONMENT

The content restitution checks were carried out on the basis of the combination provided by the RGAA 4.1.2 reference base, with the following versions:

Browsers used:

TOOLS TO ASSESS ACCESSIBILITY

PAGES OF THE SITE WHICH HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO THE COMPLIANCE CHECK

FEEDBACK AND CONTACT

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or obtain the content in another form.

Contact: service-clents@ca-alsace-vosges.fr

REMEDIES

This procedure is to be used in the following case. You have reported to the website manager an accessibility defect that prevents you from accessing content or one of the portal’s services and you have not received a satisfactory response.

Defender of rights

Free response 71120

75342 Paris CEDEX 07