arXiv Limits Submissions to Combat AI-Generated Paper Surge
arXiv has restricted researchers to two paper submissions per calendar month and a maximum of three active submissions at any one time to manage a sharp increase in low-quality content. The open-access repository implemented the policy on October 1, 2026, after recording a record 40,363 submissions in September 2026, Research Information reported.
The new limits serve as a stopgap measure while the organization evaluates how advanced AI tools are altering scholarly communication. arXiv stated the policy aims to give the platform time to improve moderation procedures and tools as AI makes the process of conducting and communicating research faster and easier.
Submission Volume Doubles in Two Years
The scale of growth in submissions has accelerated rapidly over the last decade. In September 2016, arXiv received 9,869 submissions. That number grew to 20,569 by September 2024, before jumping to 40,363 in September 2026.
This growth isn’t uniform across all fields. Submissions to the Computer Science Artificial Intelligence category (cs.AI) have increased more than sixfold over the past two years. During that same period, submissions in other categories have doubled.
AI Tools Drive ‘Thin’ and ‘Salami’ Papers
While arXiv allows the use of AI tools provided they are disclosed and the work meets scholarly standards, the repository reports an increase in submissions that fail these requirements. Moderators have identified a rise in “dense,” AI-written papers and “thin” papers with narrow scopes.
The platform has also seen an increase in “salami” papers, where a single piece of research is split into several smaller submissions to increase the number of publications. arXiv noted that AI tools allow authors to produce and submit these low-value papers more easily than before.
Volunteer Moderators Face Increased Workload
The surge in submissions created nearly 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. Because arXiv relies on volunteer moderators to detect and reject low-quality work, the influx of low-value papers has placed a disproportionate strain on these resources.
Thomas Dietterich, Chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council and Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Oregon State University, stated that a small number of authors submitting large volumes of low-quality papers consume a disproportionate fraction of moderators’ time. Dietterich noted this is unfair to authors submitting quality work, as their papers can be delayed for days or weeks.
Current Submission Constraints
| Constraint Type | Limit |
|---|---|
| Monthly Submissions | Maximum 2 per calendar month |
| Active Submissions | Maximum 3 at any one time |
Common Questions About arXiv’s New Policy
Who is affected by the submission limits?
The updated rate limiting policy applies across all submitters and all categories on the platform as of October 1, 2026.
What happens to papers that don’t meet scholarly standards?
Volunteer moderators review submissions to detect and reject low-quality or inappropriate papers to protect the arXiv corpus.
Are AI tools banned on the platform?
No, researchers can still use AI tools to support their work, but they must disclose the usage and ensure the submission advances their field.
“This policy update is being put into effect to equitably distribute our volunteer moderators’ time across arXiv authors, and protect the arXiv corpus from a sharp increase in inappropriate submissions.”
Worth a look