Two U.S. investment firms have asked a New York court to force document disclosures regarding a £450 million credit agreement that transferred most of Aston Martin’s brand rights to an external owner, according to reports. Arini Capital Management and Tresidor Investment Management filed the application demanding records from lenders and their advisors as bondholders prepare a separate legal challenge in London.
The dispute centers on a July financing deal in which Aston Martin borrowed £450 million (approximately $606 million) from a group led by HPS Investment Partners, with participation from a subsidiary of Authentic Brands Group, known for Reebok. Under the transaction terms, an additional £100 million is contingent on Authentic Brands acquiring a 50.1% stake in the part of the company that holds Aston Martin’s non-automotive brand rights, covering lifestyle products, merchandise, and licensing.
Creditor Concerns Over Asset Transfers and Valuations
Bondholders argue that the transfer makes values unreachable for them while the automotive business continues to post losses. The application filed in New York targets HPS Investment Partners—where BlackRock is involved—alongside Authentic Brands Group’s British subsidiary and financial advisors Moelis and Lazard. Creditors state that Aston Martin has withheld a large part of the requested documents from them.
Bondholders are evaluating legal remedies under New York law governing the bonds and under Section 423 of the British Insolvency Act, which permits courts to revoke transfers if they were made at an undervalue. While no formal lawsuit has yet been filed in London, creditors seek either a reversal of the transfer or financial compensation. Without a publicly released valuation for the 50.1% brand stake, neither creditors nor lenders can definitively establish the market value of the transferred stake.
Market Pressures and Index Reclassification
The legal dispute coincides with severe downward pressure on Aston Martin Lagonda’s equity valuation. Shares closed at 33.20 pence, marking a decline of more than 99% from their 2018 issue price. Additionally, an upcoming September index review leads to the automaker losing its spot in the FTSE 250 index of mid-cap publicly traded British companies.
Global bond yields are rising, complicating refinancing for weak debtors. Similar brands in the consumer sector have experienced losses, including Nike touching a 12-year low, underscoring how a well-known name may no longer support the share price.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why are Aston Martin bondholders seeking court disclosures in New York? Arini Capital Management and Tresidor Investment Management filed for discovery to inspect documents related to a £450 million credit deal that moved brand rights to an external owner.
- What assets were transferred in the transaction? The deal involved the automaker’s non-automotive brand rights, including merchandise, lifestyle products, and licensing rights.
- What legal options are bondholders considering? Creditors are reviewing options under New York law and Section 423 of the British Insolvency Act regarding potential asset transfers at an undervalue.
Related reading