ITN Disputes Claims of Enabling Peevski’s Power
Table of Contents
ITN (There Is Such a People) asserts that it did not facilitate Delyan Peevski‘s access to power, clarifying that DPS-New beginning had no representation in the government or parliamentary committee chairmanships. This statement was made by ITN MP Stanislav Balabanov on BNT’s “Panorama.”
Contrasting Actions: ITN vs. Continuing Change
Balabanov highlighted a perceived inconsistency in the actions of “Continuing Change” (CC), stating that while in power, they enacted constitutional and legal changes with Delyan Peevski. He further pointed to Ivaylo Mirchev’s previous public praise of Peevski’s Euro-Atlantic orientation.
Recovery and Development Plan
ITN MP Balabanov also noted that Asen Vassilev previously halted the Recovery and Development Plan, wich was subsequently unfrozen by the ITN-led government.
DPS Influence within Continuing Change
Balabanov directly accused CC of allowing DPS influence within their own governance structure. He specifically cited Yordan Tsonev from DPS as the chairman of the budget committee during CC’s time in power.
“We continue the change, they should announce how much the security of Delyan Peevski cost during their government.” – Stanislav balabanov, ITN MP
Key Takeaways
- ITN denies enabling Delyan Peevski’s power, stating DPS-New Beginning held no government positions.
- ITN criticizes “Continuing Change” for collaborating with Peevski on legislative changes.
- ITN points to the Recovery and Development Plan as an example of contrasting actions between the two parties.
- ITN alleges DPS influence within “Continuing Change” through committee chairmanships.
- ITN calls for clarity regarding security costs associated with Delyan Peevski during CC’s governance.
Keep reading