International Edition
Latest News
World

Cherry Nomination Splits Conservatives, Paul-Hus Defends Party Support

Conservative Support for Don Cherry Sparks Controversy The Conservative Party of Canada’s embrace of a nomination for Don Cherry to the Order of Canada is generating internal discord and external criticism, raising questions about the party’s stance on…

Cherry Nomination Splits Conservatives, Paul-Hus Defends Party Support

Conservative Support for Don Cherry Sparks Controversy

The Conservative Party of Canada’s embrace of a nomination for Don Cherry to the Order of Canada is generating internal discord and external criticism, raising questions about the party’s stance on inclusivity and historical accountability. The push, spearheaded by party leader Pierre Poilievre, has prompted a defensive response from Conservative representatives, particularly in Quebec, given Cherry’s history of controversial remarks.

Internal Divisions Within the Conservative Party

Pierre Paul-Hus, the Conservative lieutenant for Quebec, struggled to articulate a clear justification for his party’s support of Cherry’s nomination on Thursday. He attempted to highlight Cherry’s longstanding support for veterans, stating, “If you can look at it from the perspective of finding something positive about Don Cherry, for me, as a veteran, Don Cherry has always been on the side of veterans. Always.” Radio-Canada

Paul-Hus also referenced Cherry’s on-air acknowledgement of the tragic death of a 12-year-old boy in Trois-Rivières due to a hockey net collapse. However, this attempt to mitigate criticism has largely failed to quell concerns.

Other Conservative MPs expressed differing views. Joël Godin, Conservative MP for Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, indicated skepticism about the initiative, describing it as stemming from individual MPs rather than a coordinated party effort. Radio-Canada Gabriel Hardy, conversely, defended Cherry, stating he “made big things” and “we like him, Don.” Eric Lefebvre, Conservative MP for Richmond—Arthabaska, publicly stated he would not support Cherry’s candidacy, emphasizing that the Order of Canada should recognize individuals who embody values of inclusion, respect and unity. Radio-Canada

Don Cherry’s Controversial History

Don Cherry, who hosted “Coach’s Corner” on Hockey Night in Canada for 39 years, has a well-documented history of making disparaging remarks towards various groups, including Francophones, Quebecers, immigrants, Indigenous peoples, and women. He has also expressed skepticism about climate change and promoted violence in sport. Archyde

Cherry has described Quebecers as “whiners” and referred to Indigenous people with derogatory terms. He also made disparaging comments about foreign-born players, particularly those from Sweden, Finland, and Russia. Archyde

Poilievre’s Support and Public Reaction

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre publicly endorsed the nomination, stating that Don Cherry “embodies what it means to be a proud Canadian.” Yahoo News Canada He shared a petition aimed at gathering support for Cherry’s appointment. Yahoo News Canada

Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet criticized the Conservative support for Cherry, pointing out the irony of those who express dissatisfaction with the representation of Quebecers on Canadian national teams advocating for a figure widely disliked in Quebec. Radio-Canada

Canadian Heritage Minister Marc Miller expressed annoyance at the nomination, referencing Cherry’s racist and xenophobic comments and noting his own family’s Swedish heritage. Radio-Canada

The Order of Canada

The Order of Canada recognizes outstanding achievement, dedication to the community, and service to the nation. It is awarded by an independent committee. Archyde

About the author: Ibrahim Khalil - World Editor

PhD in International Relations, former UN press officer. Ibrahim has reported from 40+ countries, translating complex geopolitical shifts into clear, human‑focused narratives. “Ibrahim Khalil provides authoritative world news, from diplomacy to conflict zones, with on‑the‑ground insight.”