A Los Angeles homicide detective reportedly revealed in a new court filing that the investigation into how 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez ended up dead in the trunk of singer D4vd‘s Tesla is a full-blown murder probe.

Los Angeles Police Det. joshua Byers characterized the case as an “investigation into murder” as he requested a court order preventing the release of Rivas’ autopsy findings, a now-sealed declaration filed Friday and obtained by the Los Angeles Times allegedly said. Byers argued public release of details surrounding Rivas’ death could jeopardize the homicide investigation and had to be protected, The Times reported.

The judge ultimately granted the request and ordered that the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner’s findings be sealed, the ME’s office confirmed in a statement released Monday. The LAPD previously said it was waiting for an official ruling on the cause of Rivas’ death and, simultaneously occurring, it remained “unclear whether there is any criminal culpability beyond the concealment of her body.”

Last week, sources told NBC News and ABC7 that D4vd is now considered a suspect in

Donald Trump Gag Order in new York Civil Fraud Trial

On November 24, 2023, Judge Arthur Engoron imposed a gag order on Donald Trump in the new York civil fraud trial brought against him, his sons, and the Trump Organization. This order restricts trump from making public statements about court staff,including the judge’s law clerk,Allison Greenfield. the ruling came after repeated attacks by Trump targeting Greenfield,which the judge deemed harassing and potentially inciting threats. NBC News provides detailed coverage of the events leading to the gag order.

Background of the Civil Fraud trial

The civil fraud trial, initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia james, alleges that Trump and his company fraudulently inflated the value of assets to secure favorable loan terms and insurance rates. The Attorney General’s office details the core allegations of the case. The trial centers around claims that Trump misrepresented his net worth, potentially deceiving lenders and insurers for financial gain. The Attorney General is seeking $250 million in penalties and restrictions on Trump’s ability to conduct business in New York.

the Trigger for the Gag Order

The gag order wasn’t a spontaneous decision.It followed a pattern of disparaging remarks made by Trump about Allison Greenfield, the judge’s law clerk. Trump repeatedly posted about greenfield on social media, criticizing her appearance and professional qualifications. These posts were viewed by Judge Engoron as attempts to intimidate and harass Greenfield, and potentially to encourage his supporters to target her. The Stanford Law School provides analysis on the legal implications of the gag order.

Specific Restrictions of the Gag Order

The gag order specifically prohibits Trump from making any public statements, including on social media, directed at Judge Engoron, Greenfield, or any other court staff. It doesn’t prevent Trump from defending himself against the allegations in the case, but it does limit his ability to attack the integrity of the court personnel involved. Violations of the gag order could result in fines or even jail time.

Legal Implications and First Amendment Considerations

Gag orders, while not uncommon, raise First Amendment concerns regarding freedom of speech. However, courts can impose restrictions on speech when it poses a clear and present danger, or when it interferes with the administration of justice. In this case, Judge Engoron found that Trump’s statements created a risk of harassment and intimidation, justifying the restrictions. Reuters offers a legal perspective on the balance between free speech and the need to protect the judicial process.

Trump’s Response and Potential Appeals

Trump’s legal team has criticized the gag order as an infringement on his First Amendment rights and has indicated they will likely appeal the decision. trump himself has continued to express his displeasure with the judge and the proceedings, though he has been careful to avoid directly violating the terms of the gag order.The outcome of any appeal could significantly impact the remainder of the trial.

Key Takeaways

• Donald Trump has been issued a gag order in the new York civil fraud trial.
• The order restricts his ability to make public statements about court staff.
• The gag order was prompted by repeated attacks on the judge’s law clerk.
• The case alleges fraudulent inflation of asset values by Trump and his company.
• The gag order raises First Amendment considerations, but the court justified it based on potential harassment and interference with justice.

The gag order represents a notable advancement in the New York civil fraud trial. Its impact on the proceedings, and the potential for appeals, will continue to be closely watched. The trial itself is expected to continue into December, with a final ruling anticipated in the coming months. The outcome could have considerable financial and reputational consequences for Trump and the Trump Organization.

Publication Date: 2023/11/25 04:29:26