Dutch Politician Withdraws from Government Role After CV Discrepancies

Nathalie van Berkel, a newly elected member of the Dutch House of Representatives, has withdrawn her candidacy for State Secretary for Finance following revelations of inaccuracies in her curriculum vitae. The withdrawal marks a setback for the incoming Jetten cabinet and raises questions about due diligence in the formation of the new government.

Background

Nathalie van Berkel (born August 25, 1982, in Tegelen) was elected to the House of Representatives in the 2025 general election representing the Democrats 66 (D66) party. Prior to her election, she served on the executive board of the Employee Insurance Agency (UWV) and chaired the Network of Public Service Providers.

The Controversy

The controversy began when media reports highlighted discrepancies between Van Berkel’s claims on LinkedIn and her actual educational background. Specifically, she had stated on LinkedIn that she earned a master’s degree in public administration from Leiden University, which was inaccurate. She holds a propaedeuse (first-year diploma) in public administration from The Hague University of Applied Sciences and did not complete the master’s program at Leiden.

Further investigation revealed inconsistencies regarding her studies at Erasmus University, where she as well did not complete her first year. Van Berkel reportedly provided varying explanations and updated her LinkedIn profile multiple times when confronted by the media.

Withdrawal and Response

On February 16, 2026, Van Berkel announced her withdrawal as a candidate for State Secretary, citing the need for a “smooth start for the Cabinet.” Incoming Prime Minister Rob Jetten stated that the credibility of ministers and state secretaries is essential, particularly in a minority coalition government where securing support for legislation is crucial.

Following the withdrawal from the State Secretary position, Van Berkel also stepped down as a Member of Parliament, stating it had develop into too difficult to continue in the role.

Implications

This incident highlights the importance of thorough vetting processes for political appointees. The controversy has drawn criticism from opposition parties, who emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in government. The situation underscores the challenges faced by the incoming Jetten cabinet in establishing credibility and securing parliamentary support for its agenda.