Rassie Erasmus is not afraid to confront rugby referees for supposed errors – but when Eben Etzebeth was sent off for eye gouging Alex Mann in South Africa’s 73-0 thrashing of Wales, the coach couldn’t possibly argue with the decision.
“How it happened and why it happened, whether it was provoked, I’m not sure…but that’s not the way we want to play,” the Springboks coach said.
Etzebeth, the most capped player in South Africa’s history, was handed a permanent red card in the 79th minute by Luc Ramos after video showed his right thumb in the left eye of Mann following a scuffle between the two teams.
READ MORE: ‘Blaming me’: Norris, Russell clash in frosty exchange
READ MORE: Cowboys dealt cruel blow as rep stars sidelined
READ MORE: Spurs coach fires back at booing fans after keeper’s blunder**
Ramos said on the field there was “a clear thumb in the eyes.”
Eben Etzebeth Faces Potential ban After Eye-Gouging Incident During South Africa vs. Wales Match
Table of Contents
Eben Etzebeth, the experienced South African lock, is facing a potential suspension of 12-24 weeks after being red-carded during the Springboks’ 52-3 victory over Wales on November 30, 2024. The incident, occurring in the 76th minute of the match, involved etzebeth making contact with the eye area of Welsh flanker Alex Mann.The act has drawn widespread condemnation from journalists and fans alike,with many calling for a significant ban. This incident marks the third red card in five games for South Africa during their Autumn Nations Series tour of europe.
Eben Etzebeth clashes with Alex Mann Getty Images
Details of the Incident and Reaction
The incident occurred late in the game when South africa had already established a commanding lead of 52-3. Video footage clearly shows Etzebeth making contact with Mann’s face, specifically near the eye socket. while the exact intent is debated, the action was deemed risky play by the referee.
Journalist jared Wright, commenting on X (formerly Twitter), stated, “It’s possible that Alex Mann did something to set Eben Etzebeth off. But there is no excuse for a player of his experience to react in that manner. He deserves a big ban.” Wright further described the act as “brainless” in a separate post.
UK reporter Charlie Herbert was equally critical, saying, “How on earth can you be 73-0 up with two minutes to go and still have the horrible anger within you to gouge an opponent’s eye? Eben Etzebeth’s a nasty piece of work.” (rugby World)
Potential Disciplinary Action
World Rugby’s disciplinary process will now determine the severity of the sanction. Given the nature of the incident – making contact with the eye area – Etzebeth could face a suspension ranging from 12 to 24 weeks. A lengthy ban would be a significant blow to both Etzebeth and the Springboks, especially with crucial matches on the horizon.
Understanding Disciplinary Procedures in Rugby
Rugby’s disciplinary procedures are designed to ensure player safety and uphold the integrity of the game. Here’s a breakdown of the typical process:
* Red Card: An immediate expulsion from the game.
* Citing Commissioner: An official who reviews footage after the match to identify potential foul play that wasn’t spotted by the referee.
* Independent Disciplinary Committee: A panel of three individuals (often legal professionals and former players) who review evidence (video footage, referee reports, player statements) and determine the sanction.
* sanctions: Range from warnings and fines to suspensions of varying lengths, depending on the severity of the offense.
South Africa’s Disciplinary Record on Tour
This incident is part of a concerning trend for South Africa during their Autumn Nations Series tour. The Springboks have now received three red cards in five matches, raising questions about their discipline. The previous red cards were issued against players in games against Ireland and Scotland. (BBC Sport)
Key Takeaways
* Eben Etzebeth was red-carded for making contact with Alex Mann’s eye area during the South Africa vs. Wales match.
* Etzebeth faces a potential suspension of 12-24 weeks.
* The incident has been widely condemned as dangerous and needless.
* This is the