Eleanor Donaldson Deemed Unfit to Stand Trial in Sexual Offences Case

A judge at Newry Crown Court has ruled that Eleanor Donaldson, the wife of former DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson, is unfit to stand trial regarding charges of aiding and abetting in connection with alleged sexual offences. The decision, delivered by Judge Paul Ramsey on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, followed the presentation of medical evidence concerning her health.

What is a Trial of the Facts?

Following the court’s ruling, Eleanor Donaldson will now face a “trial of the facts.” This legal procedure is implemented when a defendant is found medically unfit to participate in a standard criminal trial.

In a trial of the facts, the court does not seek a conviction, as the defendant’s capacity to stand trial is compromised. Instead, a jury determines—based on the evidence presented—whether the individual committed the acts they are charged with. The jury may reach one of two conclusions: a finding that the defendant committed the act, or a verdict of acquittal.

Legal Proceedings for the Donaldsons

Eleanor Donaldson, 59, of Dromore, Co Down, faces five counts of aiding and abetting related to charges of sexual offences brought against her husband. Jeffrey Donaldson, 63, is facing 18 charges, including one count of rape, four counts of gross indecency with or towards a child, and 13 counts of indecent assault on a female. These alleged offences are reported to have occurred between 1987 and 2008.

Both defendants have entered pleas of not guilty to all charges. As of the May 20 hearing, the court was deliberating whether the trial of the facts for Eleanor Donaldson will proceed concurrently with the trial of Jeffrey Donaldson or be scheduled as separate proceedings.

Key Procedural Details

• Defendant Status: Neither Eleanor nor Jeffrey Donaldson was required to be present in court for the recent hearing.
• Reporting Restrictions: Legal arguments regarding the specific format and scheduling of the trials were heard in private, subject to ongoing reporting restrictions.
• Judicial Oversight: Judge Paul Ramsey is overseeing the decision-making process regarding the progression of both cases.

As the legal process continues, the distinction between a criminal trial and a trial of the facts remains a critical element of how the judiciary handles cases where medical fitness is a central factor. Further updates on the scheduling of these proceedings are expected as the court finalizes the trial structure.