Ellison to Continue Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Trial Despite DOJ Settlement

by Daniel Perez - News Editor
0 comments

Live Nation Settlement: DOJ Deal Faces Opposition from Multiple States

A settlement has been reached between Live Nation Entertainment, the parent company of Ticketmaster, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding antitrust concerns, but the agreement is already facing significant pushback from several state attorneys general. The deal, announced Monday, aims to address allegations that Live Nation’s dominance in the live event ticketing market stifles competition and harms consumers.

Terms of the Settlement

Under the terms of the settlement, Live Nation will pay $280 million in civil penalties to 40 states. The company is required to divest at least 13 of its amphitheaters nationwide and will open its ticketing technology to allow other ticket sellers to utilize its platform [CBS News]. The DOJ anticipates this change will lead to lower ticket prices by fostering competition in the primary ticketing market [CBS News].

State Opposition and Ongoing Litigation

Despite the DOJ’s agreement, several states are refusing to accept the settlement, arguing it doesn’t adequately address the core issues of Live Nation’s monopolistic practices. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has vowed to continue the litigation, stating the settlement “does very little to actually change the status quo” and fails to hold Live Nation accountable [Attorney General Ellison]. He is joined by attorneys general from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming [Attorney General Ellison].

New York Attorney General Letitia James as well criticized the settlement, deeming it insufficient to dismantle the alleged monopoly [CBS News].

Judge’s Concerns

The settlement process itself has drawn criticism from Judge Arun Subramanian, who expressed his dissatisfaction with being informed of the tentative agreement so late in the process – after a term sheet was signed on Thursday but before Monday’s announcement [KARE11]. He called the situation “entirely unacceptable” [KARE11].

Live Nation’s Response

Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino released a statement calling the settlement a “major step in improving the concert experience for artists and fans throughout the United States” [CNN]. The company maintains that artists set ticket prices and control how tickets are sold.

The settlement terms must be approved by a federal judge. The outcome of the ongoing litigation led by dissenting states remains to be seen.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment