International Edition
Latest News
World

F-35 Fighter Jet: Can It Be ‘Jailbroken’ Like an iPhone?

F-35 Fighter Jet: Can It Be "Jailbroken" Like an iPhone? The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, a cornerstone of modern air power and costing approximately $80 million per unit, has grow the subject of a surprising claim: it…

F-35 Fighter Jet: Can It Be ‘Jailbroken’ Like an iPhone?

F-35 Fighter Jet: Can It Be “Jailbroken” Like an iPhone?

The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, a cornerstone of modern air power and costing approximately $80 million per unit, has grow the subject of a surprising claim: it could be “jailbroken” like an iPhone. This assertion, made by Dutch State Secretary for Defence Gijs Tuinman, raises questions about the control foreign operators have over the advanced fighter’s software and the potential for independence from U.S. Support.

The “Jailbreak” Claim

During an interview on the BNR Nieuwsradio’s “Boekestijn en de Wijk” podcast, Tuinman suggested that European nations could potentially bypass U.S. Control over the F-35’s software. “If you still wish to upgrade despite everything — I’m going to say something I should never say, but I will anyway — you can jailbreak an F-35 just like an iPhone,” he stated as reported by TWZ. This comment came in response to concerns about the U.S. Potentially cutting off support or updates to its allies.

Software Dependence and U.S. Control

The F-35 program operates under a system where Lockheed Martin provides routine software updates through a proprietary Automatic Logistics Information System (ALIS). These updates, delivered annually or bi-annually, are akin to iOS updates for iPhones as noted by Futurism. While European nations own the physical aircraft, the U.S. Retains control over the software, creating a potential vulnerability if Washington were to halt updates due to geopolitical factors or trade disputes.

What Does “Jailbreaking” an F-35 Entail?

Tuinman did not elaborate on the specifics of how an F-35 could be jailbroken. The implications of such a process, and any potential cyber vulnerabilities it might expose, remain unclear according to TWZ. Experts suggest that while the concept isn’t entirely surprising, successfully jailbreaking such a complex system would be a significant undertaking The Register reports. Ken Munro, of Pen Test Partners, a company specializing in aircraft tech security, indicated that Tuinman’s comments didn’t surprise him, but emphasized the difficulty of such an endeavor without physical access to the aircraft.

European Concerns and Potential Responses

The possibility of a “kill switch” – the U.S. Remotely disabling European F-35 fleets – has fueled anxieties among European nations. Tuinman’s comments suggest a potential path towards software independence, allowing European forces to maintain their aircraft even without U.S. Support. He highlighted the collaborative nature of the F-35 program, noting that the UK manufactures the Rolls-Royce engines used by the U.S. Futurism.

Responses from Lockheed Martin and the U.S. Government

As of February 22, 2026, Lockheed Martin has referred inquiries regarding Tuinman’s remarks to the U.S. Government, which has not yet issued a formal response TWZ reported.

Key Takeaways

  • Dutch State Secretary for Defence Gijs Tuinman has claimed the F-35 fighter jet could be “jailbroken” like an iPhone.
  • The F-35’s software is currently controlled by the U.S., raising concerns about potential dependence and vulnerability.
  • European nations are exploring options for software independence, potentially through methods like “jailbreaking.”
  • The feasibility and implications of jailbreaking an F-35 remain unclear, but the possibility reflects growing anxieties about U.S. Control.
About the author: Ibrahim Khalil - World Editor

PhD in International Relations, former UN press officer. Ibrahim has reported from 40+ countries, translating complex geopolitical shifts into clear, human‑focused narratives. “Ibrahim Khalil provides authoritative world news, from diplomacy to conflict zones, with on‑the‑ground insight.”