International Edition
Latest News
Technology

Inia Seruiratu opposes TikTok ban, urges strict limits

“We support the introduction of stricter age restrictions on social media platforms, particularly for children under the age of 16,” Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu said in response to questions from The Fiji Times. Fiji's Opposition does not support…

Inia Seruiratu opposes TikTok ban, urges strict limits

“We support the introduction of stricter age restrictions on social media platforms, particularly for children under the age of 16,” Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu said in response to questions from The Fiji Times.

Fiji’s Opposition does not support an outright ban on TikTok or other social networks, but is instead pushing for rigorous age-based limits to shield children from explicit and abusive material online. The stance breaks down the ongoing debate over digital safety in the country, contrasting calls for total prohibitions with targeted regulatory oversight.

Inia Seruiratu Outlines Opposition Stance on Social Media Safeguards

Social media functions as a vital tool for education, communication, and learning when utilized responsibly by younger generations, according to Seruiratu. However, he emphasized that existing digital environments expose minors to inappropriate content that threatens their behavioral and psychological development. The Opposition argues that Fiji should examine regulatory frameworks adopted by international jurisdictions implementing age verification and restriction measures.

Seruiratu noted that children’s exposure to abusive or explicit material is a serious community concern. Alongside government regulation, the Opposition maintains that parental guidance remains central to managing online risks. Adults must actively monitor youth internet usage and employ stronger parental controls to block harmful digital media.

Balancing Child Protection with Freedom of Information in Fiji

Any regulatory framework implemented in Fiji must carefully weigh youth safety against constitutional rights to free communication. Seruiratu stated that the goal is not to restrict platforms for the general public, but rather to establish sensible rules that allow wider citizens to benefit from digital connectivity without compromising minors.

The Opposition’s policy approach distributes responsibility across multiple pillars. Parents, religious institutions, and local communities share the duty of safeguarding children online, moving away from reliance solely on corporate moderation or heavy-handed state bans.

Frequently Asked Questions About Fiji’s Social Media Policy Debate

Does the Fiji Opposition support banning TikTok outright?

No, the Opposition does not support an outright ban on TikTok or other social media applications. Leader Inia Seruiratu stated that platforms remain important for education and communication when used responsibly.

What specific age restriction is the Opposition proposing?

The Opposition supports introducing stricter age-based restrictions specifically targeting children under the age of 16, drawing on regulatory models used in other countries.

Who does the Opposition hold responsible for monitoring children online?

The Opposition asserts that parental responsibility must remain central, supported by churches, local communities, and stronger parental control tools on devices to prevent exposure to harmful material.

About the author: Anika Shah - Technology

MSc in Computer Science, senior reporter. Anika focuses on AI ethics, cybersecurity, and emerging hardware—frequently moderating panels at CES and Web Summit. “Anika Shah decodes tech breakthroughs and startup disruption shaping tomorrow’s digital landscape.”