I am satisfied that in the last week I have refused at least 15 invitations from TV and radio stations to comment on the shooting in Petrokhan. Although from the very first moment I was convinced that Ivaylo Kalushev was the cause of the death of the three men in the hut, as well as that he would be found dead with the other two young men. There were enough facts in favor of this hypothesis – texts to his mother, his last post on FB, as well as the peculiarities of his character. And, of course, the development of events immediately after the triple murder – his disappearance.
In the hut in Petrokhan there is a lot of evidence that the three there took their own lives, under the influence of Ivaylo Kalushev. Whether we call this incitement a sect is immaterial. A forensic psychiatrist from Pleven explained everything simply and clearly on the 4th day after the incident. But his version was not attractive to the public. For that part of her with a hyper-developed amygdala in the brain that makes them anxious, angry, and prone to seeking conspiratorial explanations for everything. I don’t remember such hysteria and excitement, and I’ve been a crime reporter for 31 years. Which also explains the mental health of our society.
Many people think that everyone in Bulgaria knows football. Big mistake! They are all top forensic scientists. And top profilers. See their versions – from Taki, to the timber mafia, human and drug trafficking, Mexican cartels, Serbian mobsters to a secret DANCE channel and what not. Check out their versions and invite them to comment on the next big kill. Like a metropolitan criminalist who, after the disappearance of Sashko in Pernik, declared that 1) the child was kidnapped 2) the child is already dead 3) the father is involved in the story. I guess you remember what happened in the end. But the forensic scientist continues to comment on every significant case in the television studios. The show on air must go on.
date:2026-02-08 15:43:00