Canada’s New Refugee Law Sparks Concerns Over LGBTQ+ Rights
Canada’s new border law, C-12, has drawn criticism from advocacy groups like Rainbow Railroad, which warns the legislation risks sending LGBTQ+ refugees back to countries where they face persecution, according to a report by The Canadian Press.
The law, which came into effect in 2025, requires refugee claims to be made within one year of a claimant’s first arrival in Canada. Devon Matthews, chief program officer at Rainbow Railroad, said the policy creates barriers for individuals who may not have immediately recognized their need for protection upon entering the country.
What is Canada’s New Refugee Law?
C-12, passed by the federal government, imposes a one-year deadline for submitting refugee claims. The rule applies retroactively to individuals who arrived in Canada on or after June 24, 2020, and is set to affect approximately 30,000 people, according to government data. Immigration Minister Lena Diab stated the measure aims to address “abuse of the system” by individuals overstaying temporary visas, as reported by CBC News.
The law does not eliminate eligibility for refugee status but shifts claims to a pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) process, which has a historically low approval rate. Refugee claims deemed ineligible under C-12 can still seek review through the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB), though the process is less rigorous than a full hearing.
How Does the One-Year Rule Affect LGBTQ+ Refugees?
A former Middle Eastern international student, who requested anonymity due to safety concerns, is among those impacted. He arrived in Canada in 2022 and filed a refugee claim after photos of his open LGBTQ+ identity were leaked in his home country, endangering his life. However, his claim was deemed ineligible under C-12 because he entered Canada more than a year before filing.
“When you get discovered as a LGBTQ person, that’s it, that’s the end of your life,” the individual said. “You can’t work, you can be arrested in your home.” His case highlights how the law may penalize individuals who delay claiming asylum due to fear of exposure or lack of immediate awareness of their vulnerability.
Suzy Newing, the student’s lawyer, is challenging the law in court, arguing it violates constitutional protections by denying oral hearings and failing to account for discrimination. “The one-year bar forces timing for when individuals come out to their families, which often coincides with heightened risk,” she said, per The Canadian Press.
What Are the Broader Implications?
Rainbow Railroad reported a 51% increase in requests for assistance in 2025, reaching over 20,000 cases—the highest in the organization’s history. Matthews said the group is considering intensified political advocacy to address what it calls “systemic risks” for LGBTQ+ refugees. “This isn’t just about policy—it’s about lives,” she added.
Legal challenges to C-12 are expected to set a precedent for how refugee claims are evaluated. The Federal Court has referred multiple cases to file review, signaling potential rulings on the law’s constitutionality. Meanwhile, the PRRA process remains a critical, albeit limited, avenue for those affected.
Why Does This Matter?
The debate over C-12 reflects broader tensions between border security and humanitarian obligations. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, where the claimant is believed to hail from, impose harsh penalties on LGBTQ+ individuals, including imprisonment. Canada’s approach now faces scrutiny over whether it aligns with its global reputation as a refuge for marginalized groups.
As the legal and political battles unfold, advocates warn that the law risks undermining Canada’s commitment to protecting vulnerable populations. “Kicking people out, you are killing them,” the former student said. “You are pushing them back to their deaths.”
Keep reading