Live Nation Antitrust Trial Continues with States Taking the Lead After DOJ Settlement
The antitrust case against Live Nation Entertainment and its subsidiary Ticketmaster is continuing, but with a significant shift in leadership. After the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) reached a settlement with the entertainment giant, a consortium of states has stepped forward to grab over the trial, alleging a monopoly in the live event sector.
Settlement and State Opposition
The DOJ’s settlement, announced earlier this week, aims to provide competitors with greater access to ticket sales. However, more than two dozen states rejected the deal, deeming its terms insufficient. These states, including attorneys general from over 20 states plus Washington D.C., have opted to continue the legal battle independently. Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska have formally settled, with Oklahoma, South Carolina, Iowa, and Mississippi expected to follow suit. Rolling Stone reports that the trial will resume on Monday, March 16.
Incendiary Internal Messages Surface
Adding fuel to the fire, internal messages from Live Nation employees have been made public, revealing potentially damaging sentiments about customers. Slack messages from late 2021 through early 2023 present a regional director of ticketing, Ben Baker, allegedly mocking fans and boasting about the company’s profits. Baker, who has since been promoted to head of ticketing for Venue Nation, reportedly described customers as “so stupid” and claimed Live Nation was “robbing them blind.” The New York Times highlighted these messages in a recent filing.
Live Nation’s Response
Live Nation has attempted to downplay the significance of the messages, characterizing them as “off-the-cuff banter” between friends and unrelated to company policy. However, lawyers representing the plaintiff states and the U.S. Government argue that these messages are relevant to their claims of excessive pricing and monopolistic practices, particularly regarding ancillary services like VIP access and premier parking. The company stated that the Slack exchange “absolutely doesn’t reflect our values or how we operate” and pledged to investigate the matter. The New York Times
Background of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit, initially filed in May 2024, stems from years of criticism regarding Ticketmaster’s dominance in the ticketing industry, particularly following the controversy surrounding Taylor Swift’s “Eras Tour” in 2022. United States v. Live Nation Entertainment alleges that Live Nation has a monopoly on the live event sector and employs tactics to stifle competition. If successful, the lawsuit could force Live Nation to sell Ticketmaster. The initial merger between Live Nation and Ticketmaster occurred in 2010.
Trial Status and Next Steps
Judge Arun Subramanian encouraged lawyers for the states and Live Nation to negotiate a resolution, but prospects for a quick agreement appear slim. The judge has ruled that the trial will resume, and a decision on whether the Slack message exhibits will be admissible as evidence is expected to significantly impact the states’ witness selection. The case was filed before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Ars Technica reported on the surprise settlement and its implications.
Worth a look