Norway seized the Russian cruise vessel Professor Molchanov off the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard to enforce a $4.22 billion compensation claim won by Ukrainian energy firm Naftogaz. According to the U.S. law firm Covington, which represents Naftogaz, the seizure on Wednesday followed a 24-hour standoff with the Norwegian Coast Guard.
The Legal Battle Over Crimean Assets
Naftogaz has pursued legal action against Russia since 2016 to secure compensation for the expropriation of its property in Crimea when Russia annexed the peninsula in 2014. A tribunal in The Hague ordered Russia in April 2023 to pay Naftogaz $4.22 billion, plus interest and legal costs. Moscow has not complied with the ruling.
Covington tracked the Professor Molchanov for months as it operated as a commercial cruise vessel. Anticipating the ship’s arrival in Svalbard while en route to the Russian mining settlement of Barentsburg, Naftogaz lawyers applied to a Norwegian court for an arrest and compulsory sale order. The Nord-Troms and Senja District Court approved the application, requiring the governor of Svalbard to enforce the order, supervise the vessel, and prevent its movement.
International Enforcement and Moscow’s Response
The governor’s office confirmed that the ship was seized and is being held in Svalbard. Naftogaz stated it is coordinating enforcement measures across multiple jurisdictions, including the United States, France, the United Kingdom, and Finland, where Russian assets have been frozen. The Ukrainian firm stated it will continue pursuing Russian assets globally until the compensation is paid.
The Russian Foreign Ministry strongly condemned the action. Russian state news agency TASS quoted a ministry spokesperson labeling the Norwegian seizure as “piracy.” Alexei Chekunkov, Russia’s Minister for the Development of the Russian Far East and Arctic, called the seizure of the Professor Molchanov “another example of Western countries’ legal nihilism and lawlessness,” according to the Interfax news agency. Moscow is appealing the enforcement process, arguing that officials were given no notice.
Keep reading