Stormont Committee Hearing Descends into Accusations of Misogyny and Misandry

A Stormont committee hearing on a strategy for victims and survivors of the Troubles was disrupted Wednesday by heated exchanges and accusations of sexism, as MLAs clashed over questioning directed at a victims’ campaigner. The session, held by the Committee for the Executive Office, resulted in an apology from the committee chairwoman to the campaigner, Andree Murphy, after she was subjected to what was described as a “personal attack.”

Context: Relatives for Justice and the Victims’ Strategy

Andree Murphy is the deputy director of Relatives for Justice, a non-governmental organization (NGO) that provides support services to individuals and families bereaved or injured during the Troubles. Relatives for Justice has been a prominent voice advocating for the rights of victims and survivors, and their input is crucial to the development of a comprehensive victims’ strategy.

The Exchange: Defining ‘Civilian’ and ‘Victim Makers’

The controversy began when Timothy Gaston, a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) from the Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), questioned Murphy about her “definition of a civilian” in relation to bereaved families. Murphy responded by emphasizing the importance of a broad definition of victims, encompassing all those who have grieved or been injured, stating, “We absolutely think that’s exceptionally useful.” She added that differing opinions are inevitable in the context of a contested conflict and that inclusivity is paramount.

Gaston countered, asserting a moral distinction between perpetrators and innocent victims. Murphy then broadened the scope of who could be considered a “victim maker,” suggesting that policymakers who devised strategies of collusion could likewise fall into that category, a statement that drew sharp criticism.

Escalating Accusations: Misogyny, Misandry, and Personal Attacks

The situation escalated when Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) MLA Phillip Brett questioned Murphy about previous articles she had written, including one that criticized the DUP and the Orange Order. Brett’s questioning was perceived by some as inappropriate and accusatory.

The exchange quickly devolved into accusations of misogyny and misandry. Sinn Féin MLA Caral Ni Chuilin accused Gaston and Brett of exhibiting misogynistic behavior, drawing parallels to past criticisms leveled against Michelle O’Neill. Gaston, in turn, accused Ni Chuilin of misandry, claiming he had been unfairly targeted due to his gender. Ni Chuilin responded by stating that Gaston’s comments were akin to those made about Pat Finucane at Westminster by DUP members.

Apology and Calls for Respectful Dialogue

The increasingly acrimonious atmosphere prompted committee chairwoman Paula Bradshaw, of the Alliance Party, to apologize to Murphy for the “personal attacks” she had endured. Bradshaw emphasized the value of Murphy’s contributions and urged a more respectful tone. Ni Chuilin also stated that individuals giving evidence should not be subjected to abuse, calling the situation “ridiculous.”

Bradshaw ultimately steered the meeting back to its intended focus: the needs of victims and survivors of the Troubles, emphasizing the importance of presenting a constructive image to those watching online.

Broader Implications and the Victims’ Strategy

This incident highlights the ongoing sensitivities surrounding the legacy of the Troubles and the challenges of developing a victims’ strategy that is inclusive and addresses the needs of all those affected. The debate over defining “victim” and “victim maker” underscores the complexities of dealing with a conflict where moral lines were often blurred. The accusations of sexism further complicate the process, raising concerns about the potential for bias and the need for respectful dialogue.

Key Takeaways

• A Stormont committee hearing on a victims’ strategy was disrupted by heated exchanges.
• Accusations of misogyny and misandry were exchanged between MLAs.
• The committee chairwoman apologized to a victims’ campaigner who felt personally attacked.
• The incident highlights the ongoing sensitivities surrounding the legacy of the Troubles.
• The need for a respectful and inclusive approach to developing a victims’ strategy was emphasized.

The development of a comprehensive and effective victims’ strategy remains a critical priority for Northern Ireland. Addressing the needs of all those affected by the Troubles requires a commitment to inclusivity, respect, and a willingness to engage in difficult conversations.