When Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy met in New York, a specific hand gesture by the former U.S. president following a handshake immediately circulated widely across social media platforms. Seated in an armchair after shaking hands with the Ukrainian president, Trump lowered two fingers—forming a V-sign—downward, sparking intense online discussion and varying interpretations of nonverbal communication.
Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy Meeting Triggers Social Media Debate Over Body Language and Gestures
Decoding the Gesture and Public Reaction
While the movement lacks a single official or universally recognized definition, observers online quickly offered multiple theories regarding its intent. In baseball terminology, two fingers pointed downward by a catcher serve as a classic signal for a curveball. The American English idiom “to throw a curveball” denotes a surprise move, an unexpected turn, or an attempt to catch an opponent off guard. Commentators suggested the posture telegraphed an intent to apply pressure and disrupt an opposing stance.
Alternatively, analysts noted the motion could simply function as a standard cue directed toward room personnel, media crews, or security teams to signal the end of a photo opportunity or the conclusion of an open session. Body language specialists observing high-profile political encounters frequently point out that interactions between Trump and Zelenskyy highlight distinct nonverbal dynamics compared to their respective engagements with other heads of state.
Insights From Body Language Analysts
Specialists from the body language analysis firm Simply Body Talk noted an absence of authentic positive affect in Trump’s facial expressions during the encounter. According to their observations, his smiles appeared fleeting, his lips remained tightly pressed, and the muscles surrounding his eyes stayed relaxed, indicators frequently associated with a pragmatic approach.

At the same time, specialists identified subtle twitches at the corners of the mouth or brief smirks on both leaders during the meeting. In behavioral analysis, such fleeting expressions are frequently interpreted as signs of suppressed irritation or disdain, underscoring the complex interpersonal atmosphere captured by cameras during the New York gathering.
Related reading