International Edition
Latest News
Technology

Waze vs Google Maps vs Apple Maps: Best GPS App for Holiday Travel

Waze, Google Maps, and Apple Plans compete directly for drivers during peak holiday travel periods, according to a comparative road test conducted by the TF1 Info journalism team. Testing three routes from Boulogne-Billancourt to Meaux, reporters found that…

Waze, Google Maps, and Apple Plans compete directly for drivers during peak holiday travel periods, according to a comparative road test conducted by the TF1 Info journalism team. Testing three routes from Boulogne-Billancourt to Meaux, reporters found that Waze finished first by arriving precisely on schedule, outperforming competitors in real-time traffic updates and hazard warnings despite being owned by Google.

### Route Testing and Travel Times

When departing from the TF1 tower in Boulogne-Billancourt toward the gare de Meaux over 50 kilometers away, the three navigation applications offered closely matched initial time estimates, according to TF1 Info. Google Maps predicted a 62-minute journey, Apple Plans estimated 59 minutes, and Waze projected 58 minutes. Upon arrival, Waze fulfilled its prediction by reaching the destination first at 11:00 AM, according to reporter Ani Basar. Apple Plans followed closely behind at 11:02 AM, earning praise from auto-moto specialist Romain Chemoul for accurate forecasting. Google Maps lagged behind the schedule, arriving 15 minutes later than its initial prediction.

### Traffic Alerts and Real-Time Hazard Detection

The test revealed distinct differences in how each platform handles active road hazards and speed controls. Waze identified speed control zones precisely through user submissions, according to the TF1 report. The platform also alerted reporters to a traffic accident before highway patrol units arrived on the scene. In contrast, Google Maps missed the police presence on the roadside and failed to route around the accident, leaving its test vehicle stuck in traffic. Furthermore, Google Maps displayed an outdated 130 km/h speed limit on an active highway construction zone where the limit was reduced to 90 km/h, according to journalist Nathalie Pellerin. Google Maps displayed all traffic lights along the urban route, a detailed feature noted by Nathalie Pellerin. Apple Plans earned positive marks from Romain Chemoul for clear graphical layouts and directional clarity. Regarding toll fees, both Google Maps and Apple Plans routed drivers through paid sections without displaying the total cost beforehand. Waze distinguished itself by explicitly stating the toll price of 2.40 euros at the outset of the trip. Despite Waze securing the fastest travel time and most responsive traffic updates, Romain Chemoul advised drivers to maintain situational awareness. He recommended combining application data with daily driving experience and local knowledge rather than relying entirely on automated routing.

About the author: Anika Shah - Technology

MSc in Computer Science, senior reporter. Anika focuses on AI ethics, cybersecurity, and emerging hardware—frequently moderating panels at CES and Web Summit. “Anika Shah decodes tech breakthroughs and startup disruption shaping tomorrow’s digital landscape.”