International Edition
Latest News
Health

BMJ Public Health Retracts Controversial Covid Excess Mortality Study

The publisher BMJ Group retracted a controversial 2024 study on post-pandemic excess mortality from the journal BMJ Public Health after determining it promoted misinformation and relied on limited original work, according to an announcement issued by the publisher.…

The publisher BMJ Group retracted a controversial 2024 study on post-pandemic excess mortality from the journal BMJ Public Health after determining it promoted misinformation and relied on limited original work, according to an announcement issued by the publisher. The retraction represents a severe disciplinary action in academic publishing, supported by two of the study’s four authors and the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, to which three of the authors are affiliated.

Retraction Details From BMJ Group

According to BMJ Group, the retracted paper claimed that excess mortality remained abnormally high in several global regions during the years following the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online anti-vaccine publications frequently cited the paper to draw direct causal links between excess deaths and COVID-19 immunizations. Although the original study did not explicitly assert a connection between the vaccines and mortality, its authors noted that elevated death rates persisted despite lockdowns and vaccination rollouts. They called on policymakers to release more detailed data to investigate the potential roles of those two factors.

Methodology and Criticism

The study faced backlash regarding its methodology for calculating excess mortality and its ambiguous framing. Critics argued that the paper invited unfounded attacks against COVID-19 vaccines, which have saved millions of lives since the start of the crisis. Prior to the full retraction, BMJ Group published an warning urging readers to exercise caution regarding the findings. Internal investigations were subsequently launched by both BMJ Group and the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology.

Next Steps in Academic Oversight

Following the institutional inquiries, BMJ Group concluded that the article met the criteria for retraction due to misinformation about excess mortality drivers and insufficient original analysis. Two of the four study authors joined the publisher and the Princess Máxima Center in supporting the withdrawal of the paper, marking the complete removal of the text from the scientific record.

Cette étude, parue dans la revue BMJ Public Health, a été dépubliée car elle témoignait « de désinformation sur les causes
Photo: letelegramme.fr
About the author: Dr Natalie Singh - Health Editor

Board‑certified internal‑medicine physician and MPH. Natalie authored peer‑reviewed studies on infectious disease and served as medical editor. “Dr. Natalie Singh delivers evidence‑based health news, medical breakthroughs, and expert wellness guidance.”