"James Comey Indicted Over Alleged Trump Threat in Online Post: Report"

0 comments

Former FBI Director James Comey Indicted Over Social Media Post

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by the Justice Department in a case centering on a social media post that officials claim constituted a threat against President Donald Trump. This legal action marks the administration’s second attempt to prosecute Comey, a prominent political opponent of the president.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Charge: Comey was indicted following an Instagram post featuring seashells that spelled out “86 47.”
  • The Interpretation: Officials argue the numbers refer to “getting rid of” (86) the 47th president.
  • Legal History: This is Comey’s second indictment; a previous case regarding testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee was dismissed.
  • Government Action: The investigation involved an hours-long interview with the Secret Service.

The “86 47” Controversy: From Beach Walk to Indictment

The core of the current indictment is a now-deleted Instagram post from last May. In the post, Comey shared a photograph of seashells on a beach that formed the numbers “86 47,” accompanied by the caption, “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.”

From Instagram — related to Secret Service

While Comey maintained that he “didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence,” government officials and critics viewed the post as a coded threat. In slang, the term “86” often means to eject, toss out, or get rid of something, while “47” corresponds to Donald Trump’s current term as the 47th president of the United States.

The reaction from the administration was immediate. Then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem characterized the post as a call “for the assassination” of the president. This prompted the Secret Service to bring Comey in for an intensive, hours-long interview in Washington, DC—a step described as uncommon for non-specific threats.

A Pattern of Legal Conflict

This indictment is not the first time the Justice Department has targeted the former FBI director. According to Newsweek, Comey was indicted last year on two felony charges related to testimony he provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2020. However, that initial prosecution effort collapsed and was thrown out due to issues surrounding the appointment of the prosecutor.

Reports indicate that the current renewed legal effort is being driven by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, amid significant pressure from the White House.

Broader Legal Context and Related Cases

The indictment of James Comey is part of a broader wave of legal actions against individuals who have been critical of the current administration. On the same Tuesday as Comey’s indictment, the DOJ announced charges against David Morens, a former adviser to Anthony Fauci.

Former FBI Director James Comey indicted over seashell Instagram post

the legal battles involving the Comey family have extended to the civil courts. A federal judge recently allowed a wrongful termination lawsuit to proceed, brought by Maurene Comey—a former federal prosecutor and daughter of James Comey—who was fired under the president’s “executive power.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What does “86 47” mean in this context?

Critics and officials interpret “86” as slang for removing or getting rid of someone, and “47” as a reference to the 47th president, Donald Trump.

Frequently Asked Questions
Secret Service Former Washington

Is this the first time James Comey has been indicted?

No. He was previously indicted on felony charges regarding his 2020 Senate testimony, though that case was later dismissed.

What was the Secret Service’s role in the investigation?

Following the social media post, the Secret Service conducted an hours-long interview with Comey in Washington, DC, to investigate the nature of the perceived threat.

What is the current status of the case?

The Justice Department has secured the indictment, and the case is now moving forward as the second attempt by the administration to prosecute the former FBI Director.


As the legal proceedings unfold, this case highlights the intensifying friction between the executive branch and former intelligence leadership, setting a significant precedent for how social media communications are interpreted as legal threats.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment