International Edition
Latest News
Business

Jim Chalmers Faces Pressure to Slash Green Energy Subsidies

Treasurer Faces Budget Pressure Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers faces mounting pressure to slash spending in the upcoming midyear budget update to combat inflation. According to The Guardian, attention has focused heavily on green energy subsidies for households, specifically…

Jim Chalmers Faces Pressure to Slash Green Energy Subsidies

Treasurer Faces Budget Pressure

Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers faces mounting pressure to slash spending in the upcoming midyear budget update to combat inflation.

According to The Guardian, attention has focused heavily on green energy subsidies for households, specifically cheaper home batteries and electric vehicle tax breaks.

Treasury officials originally estimated the cheaper home battery program would cost $2.3bn for one million new batteries by 2030. That forecast has since tripled. The 2022 electric vehicle subsidy, which exempts workers from fringe benefits tax when leasing through an employer, has also outpaced initial cost predictions.

Subsidies Versus Big Spending

Budget experts question why green programs face scrutiny while multi-billion-dollar expenses remain untouched. Stephen Bartos, an economics professor at the University of Canberra and former Department of Finance deputy secretary, told The Guardian that green subsidies should not be the primary target. “Partly because it’s small beer compared to the big-ticket items like health, NDIS and defence,” Bartos said. Data highlights the contrast in government spending:

DEVELOPING: Green Subsidy Cuts Amid Political Pressure
  • National Disability Insurance Scheme: Expected to cost nearly $54bn in the 2025–26 period.
  • Aukus Submarines: Estimated by the Parliamentary Budget Office in 2023 to reach $368bn over the program’s life.
  • Fuel Tax Credits: Cost approximately $11bn annually, primarily aiding major global mining companies.

Assessing Subsidy Value

Bartos questioned the necessity of the electric vehicle policy, noting that people are shifting regardless of incentives. However, he argued that public support for home batteries has a stronger rationale due to weaker initial price signals. Alison Reeve, energy and climate change program director at the Grattan Institute, told The Guardian that claims of the battery program serving as “middle-class welfare” are unsupported by installation data.

“Batteries are going to be a big part of our energy future,” Reeve said. “We do need to do some stimulating of that industry until it can stand on its own two feet.”

Reeve pointed to Western Australia’s state subsidy model as an alternative approach, where grants required homeowners to connect to virtual power plants run by network operators.

About the author: Marcus Liu - Business Editor

MBA and ex‑B bureau chief specializing in global finance and fintech. Marcus speaks Mandarin, Japanese, and English, and has interviewed CEOs from the Fortune 50 to Y‑Combinator unicorns. Marcus Liu delivers sharp analysis on markets, startups, and corporate strategy for investors and entrepreneurs alike.