Judge Questions Bid to Remove Letitia James as Cornell Sexual Assault Special Prosecutor

Judge Questions Petition to Remove New York Attorney General From Cornell Sexual Assault Investigation

A New York judge sharply questioned defense attorneys on Thursday regarding a legal bid to remove Attorney General Letitia James as the special prosecutor investigating sexual assault allegations at Cornell University. Judge James Farrell pressed attorney Andrew Miltenberg during a hearing in Monticello over why his client, Cornell student Gillio Lopes, filed the removal petition alone instead of joining with six other men accused in the same 2024 fraternity house case.

Say I agree with you. Does she get removed for your client’s case and the other six have her as special prosecutor? How’s that work? Multiple prosecutors for different defendants? Judge Farrell asked in court. The judge gave Miltenberg until November 5 to submit additional legal papers addressing the positions of the other co-defendants, warning that the initial petition faced a significant joinder issue.

The Social Media Post at the Center of the Bias Claims

The legal challenge stems from a statement James published on her official X account on September 28, following a civil lawsuit filed by a woman alleging she was gang-raped at the Chi Phi fraternity house in 2024. What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable, James wrote on social media. I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.

Kathy Hochul subsequently named James as the special prosecutor on October 1 after stating she lost confidence in the Tompkins County district attorney’s initial review. Miltenberg filed a petition on October 7 arguing that the attorney general’s public remarks demonstrated a presumption of guilt that disqualifies her from overseeing a fair criminal investigation.

Courtroom Arguments Over Prosecutorial Neutrality

During Thursday’s proceedings, Assistant Attorney General Kaitlin Vigars defended the appointment, telling the court that James maintains a legal duty of fair dealing to the accused and that a single empathetic remark does not impede an objective investigation. Attorneys for the state emphasized that courts possess limited authority to review a governor’s power to supersede local prosecutions.

Outside the courtroom, Miltenberg maintained that the public statements crossed the line from standard compassion into endorsing a specific narrative of the allegations. Meanwhile, a separate removal motion filed by another accused student remains pending in Tompkins County.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Cornell Investigation

Why was Attorney General Letitia James appointed as special prosecutor?

Kathy Hochul issued an executive order on October 1 naming James to the role after stating she lost faith in the Tompkins County district attorney’s conclusion that available evidence could not support criminal charges in the 2024 case.

What disciplinary action did Gillio Lopes face through Cornell University?

Lopes was suspended for one academic year and required to take a class and submit a reflective paper following the university’s Title IX disciplinary process, according to statements made by his attorney to CNN.

What is the next scheduled legal deadline in the case?

Judge James Farrell gave attorney Andrew Miltenberg until November 5 to submit additional papers on the other defendants’ positions.

More on this story: Attorney General Todd Blanche Defends DOJ Lawsuit Over Alaska Election Results

More on Letitia James: Letitia James settles with Georgia publisher over senior deception