Radboud University Report Details Physical and Psychological Toll of Netherlands’ 1985–2014 Transgender Law
Between 1985 and 2014, the Dutch transgender law inflicted severe physical, psychological, and social damage on transgender and intersex people by requiring irreversible sterilization and mandatory divorces for legal gender recognition, nos.nl reported. Researchers from Radboud University published an investigative report titled An inhumane law (An Inhuman Law) on the historical impact of the legislation, following an official apology issued by the Dutch government in 2021.
Historians document sterilization and loss of bodily autonomy
Commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, historians at Radboud University conducted 28 in-depth interviews with affected individuals to document the legislation’s human cost. The law forced citizens to undergo irreversible procedures that removed reproductive organs, stop natural hormone production, and dissolve marriages to update official identity documents. Metronieuws.nl noted that researchers described the mandatory sterilization requirement as leaving deep scars on affected citizens, stripping them of bodily autonomy and future prospects. Interviewees cited immediate grief as well as delayed psychological trauma.
The mismatch between official documents and physical appearance also exposed citizens to daily administrative hostility. Carlo Weide recounted an incident at a Greek airport where armed border guards forced him against a wall to be frisked like a criminal simply because his physical appearance matched his gender presentation while his passport still registered a female marker. Another affected citizen, Ron de Vries, criticized the societal acceptance of sterilizing young people to prevent them from having descendants, according to nos.nl.

Restrictive laws forced medical interventions on intersex citizens
The Radboud University study details how the legislation also impacted intersex individuals born outside medically standard definitions of male or female. When authorities assigned a binary gender to these children at birth, any subsequent gender correction later in life fell under the restrictive rules of the transgender law, subjecting them to identical invasive medical demands. Remke Verdegem, chair of Transgender Netwerk, stated that the legislation enforced medically unnecessary interventions driven by government fears of fictitious abuse and a narrow worldview, metronieuws.nl reported.
State Secretary acknowledges pain as legislative reform stalls
State Secretary Judith Tielen of Education, Culture and Science acknowledged the findings, stating that the research provides valuable insights and highlights the profound pain experienced by those affected by the old framework. Transgender Netwerk has called on politicians to learn from this chapter of history and grant political support to a renewed transgender law. Metronieuws.nl reported that the updated legislative proposal remains stalled.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Radboud University Transgender Law Study
Who commissioned the Radboud University research report?
The Ministry of Education, Culture and Science commissioned the study, which was conducted by historians and researchers at Radboud University, including co-author Marloes Hülsken.
What specific requirements did the 1985–2014 transgender law enforce?
The legislation required individuals to be rendered irreversibly infertile through the removal of reproductive organs, to be unmarried—which forced some couples into unwanted divorces—and to provide expert declarations from a doctor and a psychologist before updating their legal gender registration.
When did the Dutch government issue an apology for the legislation?
The Dutch government apologized in 2021 for the transgender law that was in force between 1985 and 2014, subsequently pledging that additional research would follow.