Supreme Court to Decide Pipeline Legal Fee Dispute

Supreme Court Hears McKenzie County Eminent Domain Appeal

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday, Nov. 9, in a property rights dispute originating from western North Dakota that centers on who covers landowners’ legal fees when private companies use eminent domain. The case involves ranchers in McKenzie County, near Watford City, and WBI Energy, which acquired property for a natural gas pipeline.

Eminent domain gives companies the legal power to take private property for public use, provided the owner receives compensation. While WBI Energy and the local landowners reached an agreement on the property’s value, they clashed over whether the company should pay the ranchers’ attorney fees. Ranchers maintain that North Dakota law applies, which can mandate the coverage of legal fees, whereas WBI Energy contends that federal compensation rules apply instead.

A federal appeals court previously ruled in favor of WBI Energy. Monday’s arguments before the Supreme Court will determine which specific compensation rules govern when private pipeline companies utilize federal eminent domain authority.

Energy firm and ranchers clash over legal fee jurisdiction

WBI Energy used federal eminent domain powers to secure the route for its natural gas pipeline near Watford City in McKenzie County. The dispute narrows down to a specific legal question regarding statutory interpretation and cost allocation during property seizures.

The landowners argue that state-level protections should dictate the reimbursement of legal expenses incurred during the negotiation and acquisition process. WBI Energy counters that the federal framework governing the project supersedes state requirements regarding attorney fees.

Supreme Court examines federal-state conflict over pipeline landowner fees

What is the main question before the Supreme Court in this case?

The justices are deciding whether federal compensation rules or North Dakota state laws apply to landowners’ legal fees when private pipeline companies use eminent domain to acquire private land.

Which companies and properties are involved in the dispute?

The case involves WBI Energy and ranchers who own property in McKenzie County, near Watford City, where land was acquired for a natural gas pipeline.

What did the lower federal courts decide?

A federal appeals court sided with WBI Energy prior to the case advancing to the U.S. Supreme Court for oral arguments on Nov. 9.

More on Supreme Court: Conn. Supreme Court Weighs Anti-SLAPP Hearing Rules