International Edition
Latest News
World

Why COP31 Must Start the Paris Agreement’s Transparency Rule Review Now

Delegates weigh 2028 timeline for Paris Agreement rules The rules governing country climate reporting under the Paris Agreement face a critical review deadline in 2028, according to an analysis published by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions…

Why COP31 Must Start the Paris Agreement's Transparency Rule Review Now

Delegates weigh 2028 timeline for Paris Agreement rules

The rules governing country climate reporting under the Paris Agreement face a critical review deadline in 2028, according to an analysis published by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES). Negotiators must first agree on a start date and review timeline, potentially as early as the COP31 climate talks in November, to avoid a rushed technical process that could miss vital ambition cycles.

Understanding the modalities, procedures, and guidelines

The technical architecture of Paris Agreement transparency relies on the modalities, procedures, and guidelines, commonly known as MPGs. These rules dictate how national governments communicate progress on their nationally determined contributions through biennial transparency reports, how technical experts assess those filings, and how nations evaluate one another’s climate actions. Decision 18/CMA.1 established a mandate to conduct the first review and update of these transparency rules no later than 2028, positioning COP33 as the effective implementation deadline. C2ES noted that without proactive scheduling, the technical workflow risks clashing with other major diplomatic milestones.

Navigating competing priorities in 2028

The year 2028 brings substantial logistical pressure to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Alongside the transparency review, COP33 will serve as the final negotiation for the outcome of the second global stocktake, known as GST2. Technical assessments and consultations running through 2027 and early 2028 will likely strain national delegations and secretariat capacity. Front-loading the transparency review well ahead of the 2028 deadline is necessary to prevent late-stage political interventions from overriding technical details, according to the C2ES analysis.

Potential consequences of delaying the review

Failing to conclude the transparency review by 2028 delays the integration of newer Paris Agreement elements—such as indicators for the global goal on adaptation, the New Collective Quantified Goal on climate finance, and Article 6 carbon market reporting rules—until the mid-2030s. C2ES outlined that an unrevised framework would miss both the third global stocktake and the fifth round of nationally determined contributions for 2045, pushing updates into the fourth global stocktake cycle in 2038. Such a lag risks reinforcing criticisms regarding the speed of multilateral climate diplomacy.

Priority outcomes for upcoming climate talks

Observers have outlined specific procedural goals for upcoming negotiating sessions to keep the review on track. Priorities for COP31 include signaling a clear start date for the transparency review in 2027, clarifying whether the ultimate deadline falls at COP33 or during subsidiary body sessions, and focusing the scope strictly on lessons learned from current biennial transparency report preparations. This targeted approach aims to improve systemic coherence without reopening contentious political debates already settled during previous negotiations.

Frequently asked questions about the Paris Agreement transparency review

What triggers the upcoming review of the Paris Agreement transparency rules?

Decision 18/CMA.1 contains a built-in mandate requiring Parties to undertake the first review and update of the modalities, procedures, and guidelines no later than 2028, relying on implementation experiences and expert technical reviews.

How do biennial transparency reports connect to national climate targets?

While nationally determined contributions represent promises on paper, biennial transparency reports serve as the empirical proof of implementation through time series data analysis of country progress.

Why is 2028 considered a particularly crowded year for climate negotiations?

In 2028, COP33 will host both the conclusion of the second global stocktake and the final deadline for the transparency review, creating a heavy technical and political burden for participating nations.

The next formal negotiation sessions will determine whether Parties establish an early timeline to integrate recent climate finance and carbon market reporting rules before the decade closes.

Transparency under the Paris Agreement
About the author: Ibrahim Khalil - World Editor

PhD in International Relations, former UN press officer. Ibrahim has reported from 40+ countries, translating complex geopolitical shifts into clear, human‑focused narratives. “Ibrahim Khalil provides authoritative world news, from diplomacy to conflict zones, with on‑the‑ground insight.”