The trial of Raphaël Fangamou, charged with complicity in the alleged rape and forced abortion of a minor, Rouguiatou Diallo, opened at the Dixinn Court of First Instance on July 9, 2026. The proceedings, which also involve co-defendants El Hadj Nouhou Diallo and Nema Doré, address charges under articles 19, 20, 262, and 268 of the Penal Code.
### Court Proceedings and Defendant Status
Of the three individuals charged, only Raphaël Fangamou remains in custody at the Maison Centrale, where he has been detained since October 31, 2024. During the July 9 hearing, the court noted the absence of El Hadj Nouhou Diallo, who was previously indicted but failed to appear. The third defendant, Nema Doré, remains at large.
The prosecutor, Fanka Oularé, informed the court that administrative efforts to secure the appearance of El Hadj Nouhou Diallo were unsuccessful, leading to a request for the court to proceed in his absence. Presiding judge Mohamed Sangaré subsequently authorized the trial to continue with the testimony of the detained defendant.
### Testimony of Raphaël Fangamou
Raphaël Fangamou, who identified himself as a chemist, testified that he worked as a receptionist at the clinic owned by Nema Doré. He stated that his responsibilities included managing patient logs and facilitating initial intake.
Fangamou testified that the victim, Rouguiatou Diallo, visited the clinic on three separate occasions. According to his account, the victim initially consulted with Dr. Nema Doré regarding a treatment plan but indicated financial constraints. Fangamou claimed that during a subsequent visit, he notified the doctor of the patient’s arrival, after which the two entered a private office. Fangamou alleged that the doctor later returned with money, which he was instructed to record, before the patient and doctor entered a treatment room. Fangamou asserted that the clinic, while lacking a formal operating theater, maintained a treatment area and patient beds.
### Judicial Decisions on Trial Procedure
The legal counsel for the civil party requested that the trial be conducted in chambers, arguing that the absence of the primary accused required a change in venue to ensure justice. While the defense initially opposed this motion, the court ultimately reached a decision based on the nature of the allegations.
Judge Mohamed Sangaré ruled that the testimony of the victim, Rouguiatou Diallo, would be heard in closed session, consistent with legal provisions for sensitive cases. Following the closed-door testimony and the initial deposition of the victim’s uncle, Abdoulaye Bah, the court adjourned the matter.
The trial is scheduled to resume on July 16, 2026. The court intends to hear from the primary accused, El Hadj Nouhou Diallo, at that time. Should he fail to appear, the court indicated it would proceed to final requisitions and summations.