Alaska Senate Bill 243: Removing Suppressors from Controlled Weapons List

On Friday, February 13th, Alaska Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) was introduced and assigned to the Senate State Affairs committee. The legislation aims to remove suppressors from the state’s list of controlled weapons. Proponents argue this will ensure Alaskans can continue to legally possess and use suppressors for hunting and exercising their Second Amendment rights, particularly in the event of changes to federal law.

What Does SB 243 Do?

SB 243 specifically addresses the classification of firearm suppressors within Alaska law. Currently, suppressors are categorized as controlled weapons, subjecting them to specific regulations. The bill seeks to remove this classification, aligning state law with potential future federal changes and ensuring continued legal access for Alaskans. The bill’s language emphasizes protecting the hearing of hunters and those exercising their Second Amendment rights.

Why is This Bill Important?

The bill’s supporters contend that removing suppressors from the controlled weapons list is critical to safeguarding Second Amendment rights for Alaskans. They believe that changes in federal law could potentially restrict suppressor ownership, and this bill proactively ensures that law-abiding Alaskans can continue to possess and utilize these devices legally. Suppressors, also known as silencers, reduce the sound of a firearm being discharged, which can be beneficial for hunters seeking to minimize disturbance to wildlife and for target shooters looking to protect their hearing.

What are the Next Steps?

SB 243 has been assigned to the Senate State Affairs committee. Individuals interested in the bill are encouraged to contact committee members to express their support. Further updates will be posted on the NRA-ILA website.

Background on Firearm Preemption Laws

According to the NRA-ILA, many states have enacted preemption laws that prevent local jurisdictions from imposing gun control restrictions that are more severe than state law. This aims to avoid confusion and potential legal issues for individuals traveling within the state and across state lines. Historically, some local jurisdictions have enacted unconstitutional restrictions on gun ownership, such as the handgun bans in Washington D.C. And Chicago, which were later overturned.

Recent Gun Law Trends

In 2025, several states enacted new gun laws, as reported by Giffords Law Center. Oregon (SB 243) authorized local governments to restrict firearms in government buildings, improving security at public facilities. Other states, like Colorado, enacted laws to hold the gun industry accountable, while others, like Texas and Tennessee, weakened existing gun laws.