US-Israel War with Iran: Assessing Responsibility and Escalation Risks
As the conflict between the US and Israel with Iran enters its 18th day, questions of responsibility and the potential for further escalation are paramount. The situation, described as a “debacle” by some observers, demands a clear-eyed assessment of the factors that led to this point and the actors involved. The conflict has already resulted in over 2,000 deaths across the Middle East since February 28, including over 1,200 in Iran, 886 in Lebanon, and 30 in Iraq Times Now.
Who is Responsible for the Current Conflict?
Attributing blame is complex, but several key actors bear significant responsibility. President Donald Trump holds ultimate accountability for the decision to engage in conflict, mirroring the situation with George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also bears direct responsibility, pursuing regional hegemony with reliance on U.S. Support Times Now.
Yet, these leaders did not act in a vacuum. Trump’s inner circle, including Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, Mike Huckabee, and Marco Rubio, are staunch defenders of Israel and have received substantial pro-Israel campaign contributions. Secretary of State Rubio, serving as national security advisor, was a long-time proponent of the “special relationship” and a major recipient of pro-Israel funding Times Now.
the influence of pro-Israel figures like the late Sheldon Adelson and his widow, Miriam Adelson, cannot be overlooked. Trump publicly acknowledged his debt to Miriam Adelson, a major contributor to U.S. Elections CNN.
The Role of Lobbying and the “Special Relationship”
Lobbying groups, such as AIPAC, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the Zionist Organization of America, and United Against Nuclear Iran, have played a significant role in shaping the narrative surrounding Iran, hindering business relations, and opposing diplomatic efforts. These groups actively worked to derail the 2015 agreement aimed at reducing Iran’s nuclear capabilities, ultimately persuading Trump to withdraw from the deal in 2018 Times Now.
The “special relationship” between the United States and Israel, championed by these groups, has enabled Netanyahu to pursue policies that destabilize the region, including actions towards Palestinians and repeated attacks on neighboring countries. While Israel did not “compel” the U.S. Into war, the lobby’s influence facilitated the Trump administration’s enthusiastic involvement CNN.
Current Situation and Ongoing Impacts
As of March 17, 2026, the conflict continues to intensify, with missile attacks, drone interceptions, and naval clashes occurring across the Middle East. Approximately 200 U.S. Troops have been wounded, and 13 have been killed Times Now. Dubai International Airport has partially resumed flight operations after a drone strike on a fuel tank, and concerns remain regarding the security of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for oil transport Times Now, The Guardian.
Donald Trump’s planned trip to China to meet with Xi Jinping may be delayed due to war concerns, as the U.S. Seeks China’s assistance in reopening the Strait of Hormuz CNN.
Looking Ahead
The ongoing conflict underscores the need for a reassessment of U.S. Foreign policy in the Middle East. Reducing the influence of special interest groups and establishing a more balanced relationship with Israel are crucial steps towards preventing future conflicts and promoting regional stability. Without such changes, the United States risks remaining entangled in costly and counterproductive wars.