Dr. Brent J. Steele: Pioneering Research and Vision in International Relations
Dr. Brent J. Steele, the Francis D. Wormuth Presidential Chair and University Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Utah, is a leading voice in the field of International Relations (IR). As co-editor-in-chief of *Global Studies Quarterly*, he has championed underrepresented perspectives and fostered innovative research. His work spans theoretical frameworks, historical analysis, and ethical debates, shaping contemporary discourse on global politics.
Emerging Research and Debates in International Relations
Steele highlights three key areas of dynamic research in IR. First, within ontological security studies, scholars like Nina Krickel-Choi and Bianca Naude are redefining concepts such as anxiety in state behavior and the reinvigoration of state personhood. Second, the exploration of creative resistance—including art and material practices—challenges traditional approaches to violence and global politics. Third, the Women in the History of International Thought (WHIT) project has transformed how IR is taught and researched, amplifying marginalized voices.
Shifting Perspectives and the Role of Tradition
Steele reflects on how his understanding of global politics has evolved. He now emphasizes the importance of order, routine, and restraint, contrasting with his earlier view of disruption as productive. This shift is informed by his analysis of U.S. Foreign policy and the ethical complexities of the Just War Tradition. While critical of its historical misuse, he now sees value in its framework for ethical discussions in academia.
Advancing Inclusivity in Global Studies
As co-editor of *Global Studies Quarterly*, Steele underscores the journal’s commitment to amplifying Global South perspectives. Despite challenges like visa restrictions, the journal has increased representation, with around 20% of submissions and publications featuring scholars from the Global South. Steele credits this progress to direct engagement with researchers in these regions, fostering a more inclusive academic landscape.
Historical Analysis and Its Relevance
Steele advocates for greater integration of historical methods in IR. His own work, such as the 2005 article on British neutrality during the American Civil War, demonstrates how historical contexts illuminate contemporary issues. The rise of critical security history and interdisciplinary collaborations have reinvigorated this approach, offering fresh insights into identity, security, and power dynamics.
Advice for Young Scholars
Steele urges young scholars to approach mentorship critically, avoiding overly prescriptive advice. He emphasizes the importance of supportive networks and intellectual passion, advocating for joy in the research process itself. “Dig the processes of writing, reading, and exploring,” he advises, stressing that sustained engagement with ideas is crucial for long-term success.
Conclusion
Dr. Brent J. Steele’s contributions to IR reflect a commitment to innovation, inclusivity, and historical depth. His work not only advances theoretical debates but also inspires a new generation of scholars to engage with global politics through diverse and ethical lenses.