Apple Pursues Deposition of Jon Prosser in iOS 26 Leak Case
Apple is continuing its legal pursuit of Jon Prosser regarding the leak of details about iOS 26, even after a default judgment was entered against him in October. The company is coordinating with Prosser to schedule a deposition, seeking to determine the full extent of the information accessed and shared.
Background of the iOS 26 Leak
In July 2026, Apple filed a lawsuit against Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. According to the lawsuit, Ramacciotti gained unauthorized access to a development iPhone belonging to Ethan Lipnik, a former Apple employee and subsequently shared details of the “Liquid Glass” redesign of iOS 26 with Prosser via FaceTime.
Legal Proceedings and Default Judgment
While Ramacciotti cooperated with Apple and the court, Prosser initially failed to respond to the complaint. This led the court to enter a default judgment against Prosser in October, effectively forfeiting his right to formally contest the allegations. However, Prosser stated he had been in communication with Apple throughout the process, claiming reports of his inaction were incorrect. MacObserver reported on this statement.
Current Status: Deposition and Discovery
Despite the default judgment, Apple is actively pursuing further discovery, including a deposition of Jon Prosser. A joint status report filed by Apple and Ramacciotti’s attorneys indicates that both parties are exchanging information and working to determine the full scope of Ramacciotti’s access to Lipnik’s iPhone. 9to5Mac details that Prosser has acknowledged receipt of document and deposition subpoenas and is cooperating with scheduling a deposition date.
Apple’s Demands in the Lawsuit
Apple is seeking a range of remedies in the lawsuit, including:
- Judgment in Apple’s favor
- Injunctive relief
- Damages
- Punitive damages
- An order preventing further disclosure of confidential information
- Recovery of legal fees and costs
Ongoing Investigation
The deposition and ongoing discovery process are crucial for Apple to establish the extent of the damage caused by the leak and to determine the appropriate level of damages and remedies to seek from the defendants. AppleInsider notes that Prosser continues to release videos despite the legal challenges.
The case highlights Apple’s aggressive stance on protecting its trade secrets and its willingness to pursue legal action against those who attempt to profit from unauthorized disclosures. PCMag provides further context on the initial lawsuit and Apple’s accusations.