Peronism Eyes 2027 with “Broad” Coalition, Seeking to Bridge Divides
As Argentina looks toward the 2027 elections, Peronism is attempting a resurgence with a strategy of broad inclusion, even extending to those previously considered opponents. This effort includes reaching out to figures associated with the current Milei government and past administrations.
Recent activity highlights this shift. A visit to Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (CFK) and a meeting with former PRO leader Emilio Monzó signal an attempt to build a wider base. These moves are accompanied by events featuring Guillermo Moreno, a prominent Peronist figure.
Miguel Ángel Pichetto is emerging as a central figure in this project. He recently stated, in a post on social media, that he and Monzó met with libertarian leaders outside of the Casa Rosada, agreeing on the necessitate for a “capitalist, modern and productive proposal” under a broad national front. Pichetto has a long political history, having served as a key figure in the Senate during the Kirchnerist governments and later collaborating with Macrismo, supporting adjustment laws including those related to vulture funds and pension reform. He was also Macri’s vice-presidential candidate in 2019.
The proposal, presented to CFK during a recent visit, aims to represent a sector of the national bourgeoisie that is showing signs of distancing itself from the current ruling party. This sector, linked to national industry, has expressed support for the recently approved labor reform.
Moreno has also been seen engaging with Victoria Villarruel, seeking to foster closer ties between Peronism and her political sphere.
Further illustrating this outreach, Buenos Aires Governor Kicillof attended a dinner at ExpoAgro and exchanged greetings with former President Mauricio Macri. Monzó also engaged in discussions with Carlos Bianco, Kicillof’s Minister of Government, leading to a subsequent meeting with Pichetto and legislators from Unión y Libertad.
While the specific strategies for 2027 remain unclear, the direction is evident: a pursuit of “amplitude” to challenge Milei, potentially including figures with a history of supporting adjustment policies and opposing the interests of working majorities. This approach echoes a similar strategy employed during the latter part of the Together for Change mandate, which ultimately paved the way for Milei’s rise to power.
Worth a look