Cayeron los créditos hipotecarios: abril marcó el monto más bajo en los últimos 18 meses

0 comments

Argentina’s Mortgage Market Hits 18-Month Low: Analyzing the April 2026 Slump

The Argentine mortgage market has encountered a significant roadblock. After a strong reactivation throughout 2024, the sector is now facing a sharp deceleration. According to data from the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic (BCRA), mortgage lending in April 2026 plummeted to its lowest level in 18 months, signaling a cooling period that challenges the momentum of previous years.

Key Takeaways:

  • Record Low: Only USD 122 million was disbursed in mortgage financing during April 2026.
  • Sharp Decline: Monthly lending dropped by nearly 37% compared to March 2026.
  • Year-on-Year Crash: Mortgage disbursements fell 56% compared to April 2025.
  • Primary Driver: The downturn is largely attributed to rising interest rates since mid-2025.

The Numbers: A Gradual Retreat

The decline in mortgage credit hasn’t been a sudden crash, but rather a gradual erosion of volume. Since peaking in October 2025 with USD 372 million in disbursements, the market has lost ground month after month. By April 2026, the volume hit USD 122 million—the worst performance since October 2024, when the recovery first began.

The Numbers: A Gradual Retreat
Monthly

The contrast with previous periods is stark. In December 2024, disbursements stood at USD 244 million and just one month prior to the April slump, in March 2026, the figure was USD 193 million. This represents a monthly loss of USD 71 million. When compared to the historical peak of April 2018, where USD 689 million was granted, the current market is operating 80% below that high-water mark.

Regional Disparity and Market Concentration

The distribution of credit across Argentina reveals a significant geographical divide. Data from December 2025 indicates that mortgage access is heavily concentrated in specific regions. The highest number of mortgage loans per inhabitant were found in:

  • Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA)
  • Chubut
  • Neuquén
  • Tierra del Fuego
  • Mendoza

Conversely, provinces such as Formosa, Santiago del Estero, and Misiones lagged far behind, highlighting a persistent inequality in financial access across the country.

The Cost of Borrowing: UVA Loans Under Scrutiny

Accessing a UVA (Unidad de Valor Adquisitivo) loan remains a demanding process. Analysis by economist Andrés Salinas shows that initial monthly payments often exceed the cost of an average rental.

¿Cómo están los créditos hipotecarios en México? Abril 2021

For a standard loan of USD 100,000 over 20 years (assuming a 75% loan-to-value ratio and a USD 25,000 down payment for clients who deposit their salaries at the bank), the costs vary significantly by institution:

Financial Institution Annual Nominal Rate Initial Monthly Payment (Pesos)
Banco Nación 6% $770,936
BBVA 7.5% $865,615
Credicoop 8% $898,373
Macro 8.5% $931,693
Banco del Sol 9% $965,574
Santander 9.5% $999,978
Galicia 9.5% $999,981
Patagonia 9.7% $1,013,891
Banco Hipotecario 10.5% $1,070,318
Comafi 10.5% $1,070,331
Supervielle 15% $1,408,423

These payments are adjusted for inflation via the UVA index throughout the life of the loan.

The Contrarian Opportunity

Despite the shrinking volume of loans, some analysts see a strategic window for buyers. Federico González Rouco, an economist at Empiria Consultores, argues that the current environment may actually favor borrowers. He notes that taking out a UVA loan today means receiving UVAs that have a higher purchasing power in terms of dollars than in previous periods.

According to González Rouco, for those who can find the right property and secure a rate below 8%, the current market represents a strong opportunity. However, the April data suggests that this theoretical advantage has not yet translated into renewed demand.

Looking Ahead

The Argentine mortgage market is at a crossroads. While the 2024 recovery proved that there is an appetite for home ownership, the subsequent rise in interest rates has created a significant barrier. The market’s ability to bounce back will likely depend on whether the “UVA-to-dollar” value proposition can outweigh the high initial monthly payments that currently deter many potential borrowers.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment