Court rules pro-Israel activist breached settlement with Sydney restaurant Cairo Takeaway

by Daniel Perez - News Editor
0 comments

Court Finds Birenbaum Violated Settlement Terms

Federal Court Justice Robert Bromwich has ruled that Ofir Birenbaum breached a legal settlement with Sydney restaurant Cairo Takeaway. The decision, delivered Tuesday, centers on Birenbaum’s public insistence that he had been “completely vindicated” after the resolution of a defamation dispute, a claim the court found violated the terms of the agreement.

The Origins of a Public Confrontation

The conflict traces back to a February 2025 visit to the Sydney restaurant. Birenbaum arrived at Cairo Takeaway wearing a Star of David cap and necklace, accompanied by reporters from the Daily Telegraph. Internal planning for the excursion was reportedly dubbed “undercover Jew.” In August, Birenbaum launched defamation proceedings against the restaurant’s owner, Hesham El Masry, and staff member Talaat Yehia. The litigation focused on social media posts made by the staff, which were subsequently deleted. A settlement was reached in March, which included a formal public apology from the restaurant.

The Origins of a Public Confrontation

Allegations of a Coordinated Media Strategy

The legal standoff reignited after Cairo Takeaway alleged Birenbaum failed to respect parts of the settlement. In a May hearing, the restaurant’s counsel, Matthew Richardson, argued that Birenbaum and his lawyer, Rebekah Giles, launched a “coordinated effort” to manipulate the media narrative. Court filings reveal the breach involved statements to the press in which Giles characterized the settlement as “an important win for Ofir Birenbaum and the Australian Jewish community.” The restaurant argued these “victory statements” were timed specifically to undermine the official joint statement issued by both parties.

The Truth about Cairo Takeaway and Ofir Birenbaum

Defense Claims of Justified Vindication

Birenbaum’s lawyer, Kieran Smark SC, pushed back during proceedings, denying that the comments were inconsistent with the joint statement. Smark maintained that Birenbaum’s claim of vindication was a fair characterization, given that the restaurant had issued a public apology as part of the resolution.

Case Record and Ongoing Proceedings

The Federal Court continues to oversee the case. The key details of the dispute are as follows:

  • Primary Parties: Ofir Birenbaum vs. Hesham El Masry and Talaat Yehia.
  • Court Venue: Federal Court.
  • Presiding Judge: Justice Robert Bromwich.
  • Core Allegation: Breach of a settlement agreement.

With the breach now established by the court, further proceedings regarding the consequences of the violation are expected to continue.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment