Missing FBI Files Raise Questions About DOJ Handling of Epstein Documents

The Justice Department’s release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes has been met with renewed scrutiny following revelations that key FBI interview summaries are missing from the public record. These missing files pertain to a woman who accused both Epstein and former President Donald Trump of sexual assault decades ago, raising concerns about potential political interference and the completeness of the released materials.

Accusation and Initial FBI Investigation

In July 2019, shortly after Epstein’s arrest on sex-trafficking charges, a woman came forward with allegations of repeated sexual assault by Epstein in the 1980s. She also claimed that Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump and that Trump had assaulted her in a violent encounter when she was between 13 and 15 years vintage. The FBI conducted four interviews with the woman between July and October 2019, creating summaries of each. However, only one of these summaries – detailing her accusations against Epstein – was publicly released.

Missing Documents and DOJ Explanation

The summaries of the three subsequent FBI interviews, which likely contain details about her claims against Trump, are not included in the publicly available files. The underlying interview notes are also missing. The Justice Department stated that withheld materials were either privileged or duplicates, and also cited an ongoing federal investigation as a potential reason for withholding documents. However, officials have not directly addressed why the specific memos related to the woman’s claim against Trump were not released. The Latest York Times reported on these discrepancies.

Concerns Over DOJ Compliance and Redactions

The missing records have fueled questions about the Justice Department’s compliance with a law signed by Trump in 2023, which mandated the release of the Epstein files. The law prohibits withholding materials based on “embarrassment, reputational harm or political sensitivity” to public figures. Critics have also pointed to inconsistencies in the redaction process, noting that identifying details of some victims were left exposed even as material related to accusations against other prominent men was heavily redacted.

Political Fallout and Investigation

Representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, reviewed unredacted versions of the files and confirmed that the interview summaries related to the woman’s claim were also missing from that trove. He stated that the Justice Department has not provided a satisfactory explanation for the omissions. Democrats plan to launch a separate investigation into the missing documents.

Woman’s Fear of Retaliation

During the initial FBI interview in July 2019, the woman expressed concerns about retaliation if she implicated well-known individuals. She asked agents to crop Trump out of a photograph of Epstein and Trump that she recognized, with her lawyer explaining that she feared repercussions. The FBI noted this concern in their memo.

Trump’s Previous Denials

Donald Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein. In 2024, he stated, “I was never on Epstein’s Plane.” A White House spokesperson reiterated that Trump had “been totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein.”

Epstein’s Connections and Travel Records

Records indicate that Trump traveled on Epstein’s private jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1996. Epstein also maintained close relationships with scientists, academics, and philanthropists, and reportedly had a “cozy arrangement” with members of the media, providing them with information about Trump’s behavior.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

By Mike Baker and Michael Gold/Tierney L. Cross

c.2026 The New York Times Company