F1: The Movie’s Oscar Journey and the “Drive to Survive” Effect

There’s an expression in Formula One racing: “outperforming the car.” It refers to a scenario in which a driver delivers outstanding results despite the vehicle’s limitations. This maxim could be applied to F1, the sports drama nominated for four Academy Awards – including Best Picture – despite receiving mixed critical reception and lacking significant buzz around its leading actors.

Behind the Wheel: Plot and Production

Directed by Joseph Kosinski and starring Brad Pitt, F1 centers on Sonny Hayes (Pitt), a former Formula One driver given a second chance to prove himself after a 30-year absence. He joins an underdog team, APXGP, invited by an old friend (Javier Bardem), in a narrative reminiscent of classic sports films. The film’s plot follows familiar beats as Hayes returns to racing and rebuilds his life, lap by lap.

The film reportedly had a budget exceeding $200 million, allowing for the creation of visually stunning race sequences. Kosinski collaborated closely with Formula One teams to achieve authenticity, even modifying real race cars for filming as detailed in Formula 1’s official website.

Technical Prowess and Oscar Recognition

While the narrative has drawn criticism, the film’s technical achievements have garnered significant recognition. F1 received Oscar nominations for Sound, Editing, and Visual Effects, accolades that are well-deserved. The sound design, editing, and visual effects work together to capture the speed and intensity of a Formula One Grand Prix. The race sequences are genuinely exciting, though some observers note that Sonny Hayes’ driving includes maneuvers that would likely result in penalties in a real race.

The Best Picture Question

The nomination for Best Picture, however, has raised eyebrows. Compared to other nominees like Sentimental Value, Sinners, and Marty Supreme, which are praised for their artistry and thematic depth, F1’s screenplay, penned by Ehren Kruger, relies on stock drama – including relationship issues with Kerry Condon and team rivalry with Damson Idris – to fill the gaps between racing scenes.

Notably, Hans Zimmer’s score was not nominated despite being on the pre-nomination shortlist. His music significantly enhances the film’s tension and excitement, qualities that are otherwise lacking in the formulaic storyline.

Historical Context and the “Drive to Survive” Effect

The possibility of F1 winning Best Picture is considered unlikely, mirroring the fate of 2020’s Ford v Ferrari, which received similar technical nominations but ultimately lost the top prize to Parasite. Kosinski and Kruger’s previous collaboration, Top Gun: Maverick, also received six nominations, including Best Picture, winning only one award for sound.

However, the growing popularity of Formula One, fueled by the Netflix docuseries Drive to Survive, could influence voters. The series has provided unprecedented access to the sport and its drivers, fostering a deeper connection with fans. It’s possible that Academy voters, aware of the ceremony’s declining viewership, might seek to demonstrate relevance by recognizing a film tied to a surging cultural phenomenon.

As Michael Schumacher once said, “I’ve always believed that you should never, ever give up.” In a world where films like Crash, Green Book, and CODA have won Best Picture, perhaps F1 has a chance to reach the podium after all.