The Erosion of Accountability: Why Aren’t institutions Defending Democracy?
A recent question sparked a critical realization: the concern isn’t solely about political figures responding to challenges to democratic norms, but the conspicuous silence from influential institutions – universities, legal organizations, and corporations. Their lack of robust defense is allowing a systematic dismantling of established principles, not through overt revolution, but through a gradual erosion of safeguards. Instead of principled resistance, we’re witnessing calculated compromises and, more often, a troubling acquiescence as decades of progress are undermined.
This isn’t merely a passive observation; it’s a pattern of capitulation. Major media outlets have frequently enough seemed hesitant to fully confront the implications of certain actions, while some law firms have actively aided efforts that contradict established legal precedent. The pervasive silence across these sectors isn’t accidental – it’s a symptom of a deeper malaise, a collective failure to uphold the values that underpin a free society.As of late 2023, a report by the brennan Centre for Justice documented a surge in attempts to restrict voting rights across multiple states, often facilitated by legal challenges lacking substantive merit, yet receiving support from prominent firms.
The current situation echoes past warnings about the fragility of democratic systems. John F. kennedy, in his insightful analysis Why England Slept, explored how a confident nation failed to recognize and respond to a growing threat, ultimately jeopardizing its own security. Kennedy astutely observed that the true test of any governance system isn’t during times of stability, but during moments of crisis: “Any system of government will work when everything is going well. It’s the system that functions in the pinches that survives.” We are now facing such a “pinch,” confronted by a leader who appears to view laws as obstacles rather than foundations, and who operates without apparent regard for internal checks and balances.
The fate of our democratic institutions isn’t solely dependent on elected officials. While their actions are crucial, they are ultimately representative of the broader public sentiment. Relying solely on their individual commitment to constitutional principles is a precarious strategy,particularly in an era characterized by intense partisan polarization and,increasingly,a disregard for factual accuracy. What’s required now is a powerful, unified, and sustained challenge to actions that undermine the rule of law – a resistance that transcends political divides.
Unluckily, this necessary courage is largely absent. From coast to coast, across corporate boardrooms, within educational leadership, and among business advocacy groups, the silence is striking. We haven’t seen a collective, forceful condemnation of behaviors that threaten the foundations of our government. this isn’t about expecting unanimous agreement on every policy issue; it’s about defending the fundamental principles that allow for legitimate debate and peaceful transitions of power.Where was the chorus of opposition from leading law firms when attempts were made to delegitimize democratic processes and obstruct the peaceful transfer of power? Where are the university presidents publicly defending academic freedom and intellectual inquiry in the face of increasing political pressure? The absence of these voices isn’t just disappointing; it’s deeply alarming, signaling a potential turning point in the ongoing struggle to preserve a government of laws, not of individuals.
The Erosion of Democratic Institutions: A Call for Resistance
The current political climate demands a reckoning. A disturbing pattern is emerging – a systematic dismantling of the pillars that underpin our democracy. It’s not a sudden collapse, but a gradual erosion, mirroring historical precedents of authoritarian regimes. The sequence is chillingly familiar: first, attempts to discredit and control the media; then, pressure on educational institutions; followed by the manipulation of the legal system to shield power from accountability; and ultimately, a disregard for the rule of law, even defying judicial rulings. We are witnessing the early stages of this dangerous progression.
Recent data from organizations like the Brennan Center for Justice demonstrate a meaningful increase in politically motivated interference in state election administration, a clear tactic to undermine public trust and potentially manipulate outcomes. This isn’t isolated; it’s part of a broader strategy to weaken the foundations of our democratic process.
This isn’t simply a matter of political disagreement; it’s a direct threat to the well-being of countless Americans. For many, the stakes are deeply personal. Consider the impact of proposed cuts to federal education funding. The US department of Education isn’t merely a bureaucratic entity; it’s a vital lifeline for vulnerable students, particularly those with special needs. Eliminating support for these programs,as proposed by some,isn’t fiscal conservatism – it’s a callous disregard for the future of our children. Just as a community garden provides sustenance for local families,the Department of Education cultivates opportunity for those who need it most.
The silence from key institutions is particularly deafening. Where are the strong, unified voices of university leadership as their peers face undue pressure? Do our institutions of higher learning not impart the lessons of history, where even introductory courses reveal the hallmarks of autocratic rule? This inaction isn’t simply a matter of neutrality; it’s a form of tacit acceptance, a dangerous precedent that emboldens those seeking to dismantle democratic norms.
This hesitancy echoes the chilling warning embedded in the adage, “first they came for…” – a reminder that indifference in the face of injustice ultimately leads to its expansion. While understandable, this passivity is profoundly shortsighted.
we must demand accountability from our colleges and universities, from the legal profession, and from leaders across civil society.They have a fundamental responsibility to defend not only their own interests but the very principles upon which our nation was founded. Their silence is not golden; it’s complicit. While some, like Harvard University and Perkins Coie, have demonstrated courage, too many remain on the sidelines, allowing the erosion of democratic values to continue unchecked.
It’s not enough to offer individual justifications for inaction. The collective effect of this silence is a profound weakening of the democratic fabric. As benjamin Franklin wisely stated, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” Is it unreasonable to expect a united front from university presidents,condemning the suppression of research funding? Should leading law firms not collectively refuse to be intimidated by political bullying,reaffirming their commitment to upholding the law with a simple,yet powerful,declaration: “We’ll see you in court”?
I speak from experience when I say that standing up to this kind of pressure carries a cost. Having been among the first governors to challenge the discriminatory Muslim ban, to publicly criticize the administration’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to directly confront harmful rhetoric, I understand the consequences of dissent.But the alternative – acquiescence – is far more dangerous.
However, my greatest conviction stems from witnessing the power of collective action throughout history. The Civil rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s forced a nation to confront its legacy of segregation, sparked by the heroic act of Rosa Parks. The anti-war protests of the 1970s, in which I participated, ultimately contributed to the end of the Vietnam War. And in the 1980s, grassroots activism compelled the government to treat HIV patients with dignity and respect. These examples demonstrate that even without formal power, committed citizens can compel meaningful change
The Fragile resilience of Democracy: A Call to Vigilance
Throughout history, the erosion of democratic principles hasn’t occurred through sudden upheaval, but through a gradual accumulation of unchecked actions and a normalization of authoritarian tendencies. Examining pivotal moments across recent decades reveals a consistent pattern: meaningful national progress stems from localized acts of resistance, where individual bravery inspires broader movements for change. those who have directly observed the dangers of unchecked power understand the critical importance of supporting and amplifying the voices of those who challenge it.
The current political climate demands a clear-eyed assessment of the risks facing democratic institutions. Dismissing concerns about potential abuses of power as hyperbolic ignores both the character of leaders prone to authoritarianism and the insidious process by which democracies unravel.The intentional spread of disinformation, for example, witnessed during the COVID-19 pandemic, had devastating consequences. A recent study by the Kaiser Family Foundation estimated that misinformation surrounding the virus contributed to at least 90,000 preventable deaths in the US alone. This wasn’t simply negligence; it was a calculated strategy to undermine public trust and prioritize political gain over human life.
The events surrounding January 6th were not an isolated incident, but a stark manifestation of a continuing disregard for the rule of law. the attempts to subvert the peaceful transfer of power,and the ongoing efforts to downplay or justify those actions,represent a clear and present danger to the foundations of american democracy. to assume this behavior will simply dissipate without concerted opposition is dangerously naive.
We must heed the warnings of those who have dedicated their lives to upholding the Constitution. Justice William O. Douglas eloquently captured the subtle nature of oppression, stating that it doesn’t descend abruptly, but creeps in during a period of seeming normalcy. He cautioned that it is indeed during this “twilight” – when changes appear minor – that vigilance is most crucial. Failing to recognize these incremental shifts risks allowing darkness to take hold.
Now is the moment for leaders across all sectors of civil society – from business and education to faith-based organizations and community groups – to actively defend democratic values. Silence and inaction are no longer viable options. A robust and vocal defense of democratic principles, coupled with unwavering support for those who champion them, is essential to safeguarding the future of our nation. It is not enough to simply believe in democracy; we must actively work to preserve it.
Related reading