A Legacy of conflict: Examining teh Indiana Pacers‘ Storied Rivalries
Table of Contents
- A Legacy of conflict: Examining teh Indiana Pacers’ Storied Rivalries
- The Shifting Landscape of the Eastern Conference: Opportunity Knocks for Indiana and New York
- Indiana Pacers: Building for Sustained Success beyond This Playoff Run
- The New York Knicks: Building a Sustainable Contender in a Complex NBA Landscape
- Navigating the NBA’s Luxury Tax: A Conference Finals Perspective
- Knicks-Pacers Rivalry: East’s Power Shift?
- A Brief History: Echoes of the Past
- Key Players Fueling the Fire
- Contrasting styles: The Beauty of the Rivalry
- Recent Matchups: A Sign of Things to Come
- The Coaching Factor: Thibodeau vs. Carlisle
- Benefits and Practical tips for Fans
- First-Hand Experience: Attending a Knicks-Pacers Game
- Beyond wins and Losses: The Cultural Impact
- What the Future Holds: A Power Shift in the East?
- Statistical Table: Key player Comparison
- Historical Matchups: Head-to-Head Record
The intensity of competition defines professional sports, and few franchises embody this more consistently than the Indiana pacers. While the team has yet to secure an NBA championship as joining the league in 1976, their history is remarkably rich with fierce, frequently enough dramatic, rivalries that have shaped the Eastern Conference landscape. These aren’t simply games; they’re chapters in a continuing saga of basketball animosity.
The Spark of Contention: Early East Coast Battles
One of the most visceral examples of this competitive spirit surfaced in the acclaimed documentary series, “The Last Dance,” revealing a raw exchange between Michael Jordan and Larry Bird following the 1998 Eastern Conference Finals. Jordan’s blunt post-game message – a direct and forceful expression of victory – encapsulates the high stakes and personal nature of these clashes. This moment, however, was merely one instance in a long line of heated encounters.
Throughout the 1990s, the Pacers consistently found themselves locked in intense battles with the New York Knicks. Recent resurfacing of footage featuring Reggie Miller’s infamous throat-slash gesture from the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals serves as a potent reminder of the era’s animosity. These contests weren’t just about basketball; they were about asserting dominance and psychological warfare. Today, with the NBA’s increased media presence and social media amplification, such moments would undoubtedly become viral sensations, further fueling the rivalry.
From on-Court Tension to Off-Court Eruptions
The early 2000s witnessed a particularly volatile chapter in Pacers history: the infamous “Malice at the Palace” brawl in 2004. This incident,stemming from a simmering rivalry with the Detroit Pistons,transcended the boundaries of the game and became a national news story. The event, involving players and fans, resulted in important suspensions and a lasting stain on both franchises. It underscored the potential for intense competition to escalate into damaging conflict, prompting the league to implement stricter security measures at games.
A New Generation of Conflict: The Heat and the Knicks
As the league evolved, so too did the Pacers’ adversaries. The 2010s saw a compelling series of playoff matchups against the Miami Heat, culminating in a grueling seven-game series in 2013. Despite ultimately falling short each time, the Pacers pushed the Heat – led by LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, and Chris Bosh – to their absolute limit, establishing themselves as legitimate contenders. These games were characterized by physical play, strategic brilliance, and a palpable sense of desperation.
More recently, the New York Knicks have re-emerged as a primary rival. Last season’s second-round playoff series, ultimately won by Indiana, was a testament to the renewed intensity. Now, facing off in the 2025 Eastern Conference Finals, the stage is set for a new era of competition. Both teams, surprisingly reaching this stage without being pre-season favorites, represent a shift in the eastern Conference power dynamic.
Building for the Future: A Rivalry Rooted in Sustainability
Interestingly, both the Pacers and the Knicks are constructed with a long-term vision in mind. Unlike teams built around aging superstars, these franchises are focused on developing enduring success through a combination of young talent and strategic acquisitions. This shared approach suggests that the current rivalry is not a fleeting phenomenon but rather the beginning of a prolonged period of competition. As the Boston Celtics and Cleveland Cavaliers, historically dominant forces in the East, navigate their own challenges, the Pacers and Knicks are poised to become central figures in the conference’s future. The current matchup isn’t just about reaching the NBA Finals; it’s about establishing a new order in the Eastern Conference.
The Shifting Landscape of the Eastern Conference: Opportunity Knocks for Indiana and New York
The recent playoff exits of dominant teams like the Cleveland Cavaliers and Boston Celtics have dramatically altered the power dynamics in the Eastern Conference. While these former frontrunners grapple with potential roster instability, a clear path to contention is opening for teams like the Indiana Pacers and New york Knicks – a window that could remain open for several seasons. The conference isn’t simply up for grabs; it’s ripe for a new era of competition.
Indiana’s Crossroads: Balancing Ambition with Financial Realities
The Indiana Pacers find themselves at a pivotal juncture this offseason, largely centered around the future of veteran center Myles Turner. As an unrestricted free agent, Turner represents a critical decision point for the franchise. The 28-year-old has blossomed into a vital two-way player over his ten years with the team, currently averaging 15.6 points and 6.5 rebounds per game. Beyond his scoring and rebounding, turner’s elite shot-blocking ability and surprisingly effective three-point shooting – he connected on nearly 40% of his attempts this season – make him a uniquely valuable asset. His clutch performance in the recent playoff series, including game-winning free throws, underscored his importance.
However, Turner’s value translates to a significant raise from his current $20 million annual salary. The Pacers must weigh the cost of retaining him against their long-term financial commitments.currently, the team is already committed to substantial contracts for stars Tyrese Haliburton and Pascal siakam, totaling $91 million for the upcoming season. Furthermore,Andrew Nembhard,a shrewd second-round draft pick who has quickly become a key contributor,is slated to see his salary jump from $2 million to $18 million following a recent contract extension.
This financial landscape presents a challenge. The Pacers have historically been hesitant to venture into luxury tax territory, a stance dating back to the controversial seven-year, $51 million contract awarded to Austin Croshere after their 2000 NBA Finals appearance. In fact, the Simon family ownership has authorized less than $10 million in total luxury tax payments throughout the franchise’s history – a stark contrast to the current NBA climate where eight teams are already exceeding $15 million in tax payments this season.
A New Era Dawns in Indiana?
Despite this conservative approach, there’s a growing sense within the organization that a shift is underway. Sources indicate the Pacers are poised to embark on a new era, one focused on sustained contention with the league’s elite – the Boston Celtics, Cleveland Cavaliers, New York Knicks, and others. This ambition will require a calculated risk, possibly involving a willingness to exceed the luxury tax threshold.
The Pacers’ success hinges on carefully navigating this financial tightrope. Retaining Turner, while expensive, could be the catalyst needed to elevate the team to the next level. However, they must also consider the long-term implications of their spending and ensure they maintain flexibility to address future needs. The team’s ability to balance short-term gains with long-term sustainability will ultimately determine whether they can capitalize on this opportune moment in the Eastern Conference.
Indiana Pacers: Building for Sustained Success beyond This Playoff Run
The Indiana Pacers are currently engaged in a compelling playoff series, demonstrating a level of competitiveness that has sparked discussions about the franchise’s long-term trajectory. While the immediate focus is on navigating the postseason, the organization appears committed to building a sustainable contender, even if it means strategically adjusting their financial approach.
Current Series Outlook
As of May 24th, the Pacers trail the Boston Celtics in their best-of-seven series. here’s a look at the schedule:
Game 1: Celtics 114, Pacers 88
Game 2: Celtics 118, Pacers 103
Game 3: May 25th at Indiana, 8:30 p.m. ET (ABC)
Game 4: may 27th at indiana, 8:30 p.m. ET
Game 5: May 29th at Boston, 8:30 p.m. ET
Game 6: May 31st at indiana, 8:30 p.m. ET
Game 7: June 2nd at Boston, 8:30 p.m.ET
(Games 5, 6, and 7 are contingent on the series outcome)
You can find comprehensive playoff coverage, including schedules and scores, here.
A Shift in Ownership Philosophy?
The Pacers, under the leadership of Herb Simon, have historically prioritized fiscal prudence. However, with Simon approaching his 91st birthday and the introduction of new investors, a subtle shift in strategy is becoming apparent. The recent success of the team – reaching a deep playoff run – has seemingly encouraged ownership to consider increased investment in player retention. Sources indicate a willingness to potentially exceed the salary cap to maintain the current core group of players.
Navigating the Luxury Tax Landscape
It’s vital to note that the Pacers aren’t poised to replicate the financial commitments of teams like the Phoenix Suns, who currently face a tax burden exceeding $150 million. Indiana will likely adopt a more measured approach. Fortunately,the impending influx of revenue from the NBA’s new $77 billion media rights deal is projected to raise the salary cap by approximately 30% over the next three years,providing greater financial flexibility.
this presents a unique opportunity for the Pacers.They can potentially enhance their roster without instantly triggering the more punitive “repeater tax” penalties associated with consistently exceeding the cap.
the Myles Turner Question
A key component of the Pacers’ future plans revolves around the contract of center Myles Turner.While rival teams remain cautiously optimistic – given the Pacers’ historical aversion to the luxury tax – the organization is reportedly steadfast to retain Turner without compromising the team’s overall depth. This will require careful negotiation and potentially creative roster management.
Long-Term Vision: Building a Consistent Contender
Ultimately, the Pacers’ objective extends beyond this single playoff appearance. The goal is to establish a consistently competitive team capable of making deep postseason runs for years to come. This requires a delicate balance between investing in key players, maintaining roster flexibility, and adhering to a responsible financial framework.
The New York Knicks: Building a Sustainable Contender in a Complex NBA Landscape
The modern NBA is a league defined by financial constraints as much as on-court talent. Teams aren’t simply built on star power; they’re constructed within the intricate framework of salary caps, luxury taxes, and increasingly complex “apron” rules. The New York Knicks, after years of rebuilding, are demonstrating a shrewd approach to navigating these challenges, positioning themselves for sustained success – a feat previously hampered by a history of lavish spending.
A History of Financial Outliers
For years, the Knicks were known for a willingness to spend aggressively, often exceeding the luxury tax threshold. Between 2002 and 2010, owner James Dolan authorized over $200 million in luxury tax payments, a figure that stood out substantially at the time.However, this spending didn’t translate into consistent playoff contention. In fact, the team endured a prolonged period of struggle, highlighting the limitations of simply outspending rivals. This year marks the first time in over a decade the Knicks are paying the luxury tax, signaling a shift in strategy and the emergence of a genuinely competitive roster.
The Power of Contractual Flexibility
The Knicks’ current trajectory isn’t solely about spending; it’s about smart spending and maximizing flexibility under the NBA’s evolving rules. Many analysts believe New York is forging a new path, potentially mirroring the strategic approach of teams like the Indiana Pacers. Central to this is the remarkably team-pleasant contract extension signed by star point guard Jalen Brunson last July.
Brunson agreed to a four-year, $156 million deal, a significant discount compared to the potential five-year, $270 million contract he could have secured this summer. This decision provides the Knicks with crucial cap space as the salary cap continues to rise, allowing them to add complementary pieces without crippling their financial future. It’s a testament to Brunson’s commitment to the team and a masterstroke of negotiation by the Knicks’ front office.
Balancing Star Power with Financial Prudence
The Knicks haven’t shied away from acquiring established talent. The additions of forward OG Anunoby (a $212 million contract) and center karl-Anthony Towns (earning $110 million over two seasons) demonstrate their commitment to bolstering the roster. Remarkably, despite these significant investments, the Knicks are projected to remain below the second apron next season – a critical advantage in a league where exceeding this threshold severely limits a team’s ability to make roster improvements.
Currently, the NBA salary cap is set at $141 million for the 2024-25 season, with the luxury tax line at $160.3 million and the hard cap (second apron) at $172.3 million. Staying under the second apron allows teams to retain more flexibility in trades and free agency, avoiding harsh penalties that can hinder long-term growth. As of May 2024, approximately half of NBA teams are projected to be paying the luxury tax, demonstrating the competitive pressure to spend.
Addressing the Depth Challenge
Despite their success in acquiring star players and maintaining financial flexibility, the Knicks face a significant challenge: a lack of consistent depth.Trades for Mikal Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns, while improving the team’s overall talent, depleted their bench. Throughout the regular season and playoffs, coach Tom thibodeau has frequently relied on a tight rotation of just seven players.
though, remaining under the second apron provides the Knicks with a valuable tool to address this issue. They are projected to have access to the $6 million taxpayer midlevel exception, allowing them to add experienced role players without jeopardizing their cap space. While this might not result in a blockbuster acquisition, these marginal gains can be crucial in a competitive playoff environment.
Looking Ahead: A sustainable Path to Contention
The New York Knicks are demonstrating a new model for building a contender in the modern NBA. by prioritizing contractual flexibility,
The NBA Conference Finals aren’t just battles on the court; they’re also showcases of contrasting team-building philosophies, particularly concerning the league’s complex luxury tax system. As teams advance, the financial implications of roster construction become increasingly apparent, potentially shaping future strategies and limiting long-term flexibility. Currently, the salary cap is set at $141 million for the 2024-25 season, with the luxury tax threshold at $172.3 million. Teams exceeding this threshold face escalating penalties, impacting their ability to maneuver in free agency and retain key players.
The Perils of the Second Apron
Several contenders are already grappling with the constraints of the “second apron” – the level of luxury tax spending that triggers even more severe restrictions. The Boston celtics, for example, are projected to have a payroll exceeding $400-500 million next season, even before factoring in the recent achilles injury to star Jayson Tatum.This substantial financial commitment forces arduous decisions, potentially requiring the team to part ways with valuable contributors simply to maintain roster flexibility. The Celtics’ situation highlights a critical challenge: sustained success often comes at a steep financial price.
Similarly, the Cleveland Cavaliers are facing a precarious situation as they approach the second apron.With key bench players like Ty Jerome and Sam Merrill entering unrestricted free agency, the Cavaliers risk losing valuable depth. While ownership has reportedly authorized increased spending, the punitive nature of the luxury tax makes re-signing these players – or adding new ones – increasingly difficult. The issue isn’t solely about having the funds available; it’s about the escalating penalties that severely restrict roster management options. Deeper incursions into the luxury tax create a cycle that’s notoriously hard to break.
Runway for Growth: The Knicks and Pacers model
In contrast to teams burdened by the luxury tax, the New York knicks and Indiana Pacers represent a more sustainable path to contention. Both franchises have successfully cultivated rosters with a blend of established stars and promising young talent, all while maintaining financial flexibility. This “runway” – the ability to make strategic moves without immediate financial repercussions – is a significant advantage.
The Knicks, after years of rebuilding, have assembled a competitive roster without crippling their future cap space. The pacers, fueled by the emergence of Tyrese Haliburton and a core of developing players, are in a similar position. This allows them to explore potential upgrades through free agency or trades without facing the same restrictive penalties as teams already deep into the luxury tax.
The Fragility of NBA Plans
Despite careful planning, the NBA landscape is inherently unpredictable. Injuries, unexpected player development, and shifting market conditions can quickly derail even the most well-laid strategies. The Celtics’ situation, exacerbated by Tatum’s injury, serves as a stark reminder of this fragility.
Ultimately, the conference Finals offer a compelling case study in NBA team building. While immediate success is the primary goal,the long-term health of a franchise hinges on navigating the complexities of the luxury tax and maintaining the flexibility to adapt to the ever-changing dynamics of the league. The Knicks and Pacers, with their combination of talent and financial stability, are well-positioned to compete not just this season, but for years to come.
Knicks-Pacers Rivalry: East’s Power Shift?
The Eastern Conference landscape is constantly evolving, and the burgeoning rivalry between the New York Knicks and the Indiana Pacers is a key factor in this power shift. What started as playoff matchups has blossomed into a compelling narrative of two teams with contrasting styles, determined leadership, and ambitions of contending for an NBA championship. This analysis dives deep into the roots of this rivalry, it’s critical moments, the players shaping its future, and what it means for the overall balance of power in the East.
A Brief History: Echoes of the Past
While the current Knicks-Pacers rivalry feels fresh, it has historical roots. The two franchises have clashed in crucial playoff series over the years, particularly in the 1990s. These matchups, filled with intensity and memorable performances, laid the foundation for the competitive spirit we see today. While not as historically deep as some other NBA rivalries, the intensity during these postseason battles was palpable.
- 1993 Eastern Conference Finals: The Knicks, led by Patrick Ewing, defeated the Pacers in a hard-fought seven-game series.This series is remembered for its physical play and the emergence of Reggie Miller as a Knicks villain.
- 1994 Eastern Conference Finals: The Pacers exacted revenge, defeating the Knicks in another seven-game thriller. Reggie Miller’s iconic 8 points in 9 seconds solidified his status and fueled the rivalry.
- 1995 Eastern Conference Semifinals: Indiana triumphed in a memorable series that went the distance, further etching the rivalry into NBA lore.
- 1999 Eastern Conference Finals: The Knicks, in a Cinderella run, defeated the Pacers en route to the NBA Finals. This series was physical and grinding, emblematic of the era.
These past encounters created a shared history between the two franchises, filled with moments of triumph, heartbreak, and unforgettable performances.although years passed without meaningful contention,the seeds of a competitive relationship were sown.
Key Players Fueling the Fire
Every great rivalry needs its stars, and the current Knicks-Pacers matchup is no exception. Both teams boast young, talented players who are quickly becoming household names.
New York Knicks: A Resurgence Led by Jalen Brunson
The Knicks’ resurgence is largely attributed to the arrival and leadership of jalen Brunson. His scoring prowess, playmaking ability, and unwavering determination have transformed the team into a legitimate contender.His ability to elevate his teammates and thrive under pressure makes him a key figure in this rivalry.
- Jalen Brunson: The engine of the Knicks offense, Brunson’s scoring and playmaking are crucial.
- Julius Randle: Randle’s power and scoring presence inside are vital for the Knicks’ success. While his consistency is sometiems questioned, his peak performances are game-changing.
- RJ Barrett: A key perimeter threat,Barrett’s scoring punch and defensive effort contribute considerably.
- OG Anunoby: His arrival via trade brought elite defense and three-point shooting to the Knicks, making them an even tougher opponent.
indiana Pacers: Youthful Energy and Tyrese Haliburton’s Vision
the Pacers are building a radiant future around Tyrese Haliburton, a dynamic point guard with extraordinary court vision and playmaking skills. His ability to create opportunities for his teammates and control the tempo of the game makes him a formidable opponent.
- Tyrese Haliburton: the engine of the Pacers offense, Haliburton’s passing and scoring make him incredibly difficult to defend.
- Myles Turner: A versatile big man who can score inside and out, as well as protect the rim.
- Bennedict Mathurin: A high-scoring rookie with the potential to be a future star.
- Pascal Siakam: Traded to the Pacers, his championship experience and scoring ability instantly elevated the team.
Contrasting styles: The Beauty of the Rivalry
One of the most compelling aspects of the Knicks-Pacers rivalry is the contrasting styles of play that each team brings to the court. These differences create intriguing matchups and make each game a unique chess match.
- Knicks: Known for their physicality and defensive toughness, the Knicks prioritize controlling the paint, rebounding, and limiting opponents’ scoring opportunities. Their half-court offense often relies on Brunson’s ability to create shots and Randle’s inside presence.
- Pacers: Emphasize a fast-paced, high-scoring offense predicated on ball movement, three-point shooting, and exploiting mismatches. Haliburton’s playmaking is central to their up-tempo approach, and they aim to wear down opponents with their relentless energy.
This clash of styles makes each game unpredictable and forces both teams to adjust their strategies and game plans. The contrast in approaches is a major draw for fans and adds another layer of intrigue to the rivalry.
Recent Matchups: A Sign of Things to Come
Recent games between the Knicks and Pacers have been closely contested, showcasing the intensity and competitiveness that defines the rivalry.These matchups have provided a glimpse into the future and suggest that this rivalry will be a prominent feature of the Eastern Conference landscape for years to come.
- Close Games: Manny of the recent games have been decided in the final minutes,highlighting the tight competition between the two teams.
- Individual Performances: Both teams have seen outstanding individual performances from their key players, further fueling the rivalry.
- Playoff Implications: The outcome of these games frequently enough has significant playoff implications, adding extra weight to each contest.
These recent clashes have served as a preview of the intensity and competitiveness that fans can expect from this rivalry moving forward.
The Coaching Factor: Thibodeau vs. Carlisle
the coaching matchup between Tom Thibodeau of the Knicks and Rick Carlisle of the Pacers adds another layer of intrigue to the rivalry. Both coaches are highly respected for their strategic acumen and ability to motivate their players.
- Tom Thibodeau: Known for his defensive-minded approach and demanding style, Thibodeau has instilled a culture of toughness and resilience in the Knicks.
- Rick Carlisle: A veteran coach with a championship pedigree,Carlisle is renowned for his offensive creativity and ability to adapt to different situations.
The coaching battle will be a crucial factor in determining the outcome of future matchups. Both coaches will need to devise strategies to exploit their opponents’ weaknesses and maximize their own teams’ strengths.
Benefits and Practical tips for Fans
Beyond the on-court action, engaging with the Knicks-Pacers rivalry can be a rewarding experience for fans. Here are some benefits and practical tips for maximizing your enjoyment:
- Increased Excitement: Having a vested interest in a rivalry adds another layer of excitement to watching NBA games.
- Deeper Understanding: Following the rivalry closely allows you to gain a deeper understanding of the nuances of each team’s strategy and player progress.
- Community Engagement: Sharing your thoughts and opinions with other fans online or in person can enhance your enjoyment of the rivalry.
Practical Tips:
- Stay Informed: Follow reputable NBA news sources and analysts for the latest updates and insights into the rivalry.
- Engage on Social Media: participate in discussions and debates on social media platforms using relevant hashtags.
- Attend Games (if possible): Experiencing the intensity of a Knicks-Pacers game in person is an unforgettable experience.
First-Hand Experience: Attending a Knicks-Pacers Game
Nothing quite captures the essence of the Knicks-Pacers rivalry like witnessing it live and in person. The atmosphere in the arena is electric, charged with a palpable sense of anticipation. from the roar of the crowd during key plays to the intensity of the players on the court, it’s an experience that transcends the television screen.
One personal anecdote involves attending a game at Madison Square Garden where the Knicks narrowly defeated the Pacers in overtime. The energy in the building was unbelievable. The back-and-forth scoring,the clutch defensive stops,and the deafening cheers after every basket created an atmosphere of pure adrenaline.You could feel the history of the rivalry echoing through the Garden’s hallowed halls.
The shared experience with fellow fans, the collective gasps and sighs during momentum shifts, the high-fives after a crucial play – it’s these moments that truly define the rivalry experience. Attending a Knicks-Pacers game is a reminder of the passion and excitement that sports can bring, and it solidifies the importance of this evolving rivalry.
Beyond wins and Losses: The Cultural Impact
The Knicks-Pacers rivalry extends beyond the basketball court, influencing cultural conversations and fan engagement. The intensity and drama of the matchups often spill over into social media discussions, office debates, and local sports bars. This rivalry has become a part of the broader NBA narrative,attracting attention from casual and die-hard fans alike.
The rivalry also provides opportunities for unique marketing and branding initiatives.Both teams can leverage the heightened interest to create engaging content, merchandise, and fan experiences. This heightened visibility can boost team revenue, attract new sponsorship opportunities, and further solidify their place in the NBA hierarchy.
What the Future Holds: A Power Shift in the East?
The long-term implications of the Knicks-Pacers rivalry are significant. Both teams are on the rise, and their continued success will have a major impact on the balance of power in the Eastern Conference. If both teams continue improving, their matchups could be decisive in determining playoff seeding and championship aspirations.
- Eastern Conference Contenders: The rivalry could elevate both teams into perennial contenders, challenging the established powerhouses in the East.
- Playoff Showdowns: The possibility of future playoff series between the Knicks and Pacers is a tantalizing prospect for fans, promising intense and memorable matchups.
- Influence on Other Teams: The success of the Knicks and Pacers could inspire other teams in the East to emulate their strategies and build their own competitive rosters.
The Knicks-Pacers rivalry is more than just a series of games; it’s a reflection of the evolving landscape of the NBA and the emergence of new contenders. As both teams continue to develop and compete,this rivalry promises to be a captivating and influential force in the Eastern Conference.
Statistical Table: Key player Comparison
| Player | Team | Points Per Game | Assists Per Game | Rebounds Per Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Brunson | Knicks | 27.7 | 6.7 | 3.6 |
| Tyrese haliburton | Pacers | 20.7 | 10.4 | 3.7 |
| Julius randle | Knicks | 24.0 | 4.9 | 9.2 |
| Pascal Siakam | Pacers | 21.7 | 4.3 | 7.1 |
Historical Matchups: Head-to-Head Record
| Statistic | Knicks | Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Regular Season Wins | 87 | 91 |
| Playoff Series Wins | 3 | 2 |
| Total Games Played | 178 | 178 |