Summary of Public Opinion & Planning Assessment of St. Stephen’s Green Shopping Center Redevelopment
This text details the debate surrounding proposed redevelopment plans for the St. Stephen’s Green Shopping Centre in Dublin. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
Planning Authority Assessment:
* Mixed Feelings Acknowledged: The planning authority recognizes a surprising level of affection for the existing shopping centre, despite its architectural shortcomings. It acknowledges previous criticisms (described as a “disappointing conclusion” to the area) but notes the current building has gained a certain fondness, especially among younger generations who don’t remember what preceded it.
* Historical Context: The current centre replaced 18th and 19th-century buildings and a bottling plant that had been allowed to decay. The original construction wasn’t considered sensitive to the historic environment at the time, but is now viewed critically.
* Impact Assessment: An architectural heritage impact assessment concludes the proposed advancement will not negatively impact St. Stephen’s Green or surrounding national monuments. The new building’s prominence is considered similar to the existing one, and views from the park will largely remain screened by trees. The overall character change is deemed comparable to the impact of the current building.
* Overall: the assessment suggests the new development’s impact will be no more negative than the existing structure.
Public Opinion (from RTÉ News interviews):
* Strong Preference for the Existing Building: Interviewed locals overwhelmingly expressed a desire to keep the current shopping centre.
* Nostalgia: Many have fond childhood memories associated with the centre, particularly features like the large clock.
* Iconic Status: Some believe the centre has become an iconic Dublin landmark, frequently photographed by tourists.
* Aesthetic concerns: People described the current building positively (“stranded Mississippi riverboat”) and criticized the new plans as “messy” and lacking flow.
* Authenticity & History: Some feel the current building is more “authentic” and represents the area’s history, while the proposed design is simply “modern.”
In essence, the planning authority is taking a pragmatic approach, focusing on minimizing harm to the historical environment. However, public sentiment leans heavily towards preserving the existing, albeit architecturally debated, shopping centre.
Worth a look