IMAX remains the gold standard for large-format cinematography, but the claim that any film has been shot "entirely" on IMAX 70mm film is often misunderstood in industry reporting. While directors like Christopher Nolan have championed the format for its unparalleled resolution and aspect ratio, the technical realities of IMAX cameras—specifically their size, noise, and film magazine capacity—make them impractical for every shot in a production.
The Technical Reality of IMAX Filming
IMAX cameras capture images on 65mm film, which is then printed onto 70mm stock for projection. According to IMAX’s official technical specifications, the physical size of the film frame is nearly ten times larger than standard 35mm, providing a level of detail that remains the benchmark for the format. However, the cameras are notoriously heavy, loud, and limited by short film reel runtimes.
Because of these constraints, even productions marketed as "filmed for IMAX" typically utilize a mix of IMAX cameras and high-end digital or 35mm cameras. No film in history has been shot 100% on IMAX 70mm film stock due to these physical limitations. For instance, in Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer, the production team used a combination of IMAX 65mm and Panavision 65mm film cameras to capture the massive scope of the story, as noted by Kodak’s technical breakdown of the film’s production.
Why Directors Still Choose IMAX
Despite the logistical challenges, the aesthetic appeal of the format drives its continued use. The 1.43:1 aspect ratio offered by IMAX 70mm allows filmmakers to capture more vertical information, creating an immersive experience that digital formats struggle to replicate.
Industry standards have shifted toward "filmed for IMAX" certification, which acknowledges the use of high-resolution digital sensors that meet IMAX’s rigorous quality requirements. Cameras like the ARRI Alexa 65, which has been used on blockbusters like Dune: Part Two, are often used in tandem with IMAX film cameras. This hybrid approach allows directors to maintain the "IMAX look" while gaining the mobility required for complex action sequences.
Comparison of Large-Format Technologies
| Technology | Format | Primary Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| IMAX 70mm | Film (65mm negative) | Highest resolution, 1.43:1 aspect ratio |
| IMAX Digital | Digital Sensor | Efficiency, accessibility for standard theaters |
| Panavision 65 | Film (65mm negative) | Cinematic depth, high-quality lens compatibility |
Key Takeaways for Cinematography Enthusiasts
- No "Entirely" IMAX Films: Due to camera weight and noise, no major motion picture has been shot exclusively on IMAX 70mm film.
- Hybrid Workflows: Modern productions combine IMAX film cameras with other large-format sensors to balance visual quality with production speed.
- Aspect Ratio Matters: The primary draw of IMAX is the 1.43:1 aspect ratio, which provides a significantly taller image than the standard widescreen theatrical format.
- Certification: The "Filmed for IMAX" label now encompasses both film and high-end digital cameras that pass IMAX’s technical testing, a standard introduced to ensure quality across the global theater network.
As production technology evolves, the industry continues to prioritize large-format capture, yet the physical limitations of film will likely ensure that a mix of cameras remains the industry standard for large-scale cinematic projects.
Keep reading