Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for disease Control and Prevention. Intimate partner violence: definitions. Centers for disease control and prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention; 2010.
Gass JD, Stein DJ, Williams DR, Seedat S. Gender differences in risk for intimate partner violence among South African adults. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(14):2764-89.
Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholarlookup?&title=Gender%20differences%20in%20risk%20for%20intimate%20partner%20violence%20among%20South%20African%20adults&journal=J%20Interpers%20Violence&volume=26&issue=14&pages=2764-89&publicationyear=2011&author=Gass%2CJD&author=Stein%2CDJ&author=Williams%2CDR&author=Seedat%2CS
Miller E, McCaw B. Intimate partner violence. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):850-7. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1807166
Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholarlookup?&title=Intimate%20partner%20violence&journal=N%20Engl%20J%20Med&volume=380&issue=9&pages=850-7&publicationyear=2019&author=Miller%2CE&author=McCaw%2CBMcClintock HF, Dulak SL. Intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections among women in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Immigr Minor Health. 2021;23:191-8.
Muluneh MD, Francis L, Agho K, Stulz V. The relationship between intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy: Eastern sub saharan African countries’ analysis of demographic and health surveys. J Interpers Violence. 2023;38(7-8):5375-403.
Sarkar NN. The impact of intimate partner violence on women’s reproductive health and pregnancy outcome.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(3):266-71.1. World Health Organization. Violence against women prevalence estimates. 2021. Retrieved from
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Intimate partner violence (IPV) factsheet. 2021. Retrieved from
3. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Closing the gaps: preventing intimate partner violence. World Health Organization; 2008.
4.Duvall-Anumah S, Okeke C, Opare-Henaku A, et al. prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among women in Ghana: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2019;19(1):1-11.
5. Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Lombard C, et al. Association between men’s gender-equitable attitudes and intimate partner violence in South Africa: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166683.
6. Jewkes R, Flood M, Langston K. From “boys will be boys” to “men will change”: a critical review of interventions to prevent violence against women. Gender & Progress. 2002;10(2):34-43.
7. Bott S,Guedes A,Goodman S,et al. Addressing gender-based violence in the context of humanitarian action: a review of current evidence and programming approaches. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2012.
8. Heise LL, Ellsberg MJ, Gottmoeller M. A global overview of interventions to prevent and respond to gender-based violence. New York: United nations Development Program; 1999.
9. Campbell J. Empowering women to end violence against women: a feminist approach to prevention.Violence Against Women. 2002;8(12):1339-63.
10. Taft AJ, patterson DA, Butler LD. A meta-analysis of psychological interventions for intimate partner violence. Aggression Behav. 2004;30(1):6-26.
11. Onarheim KH. The impact of social norms on intimate partner violence: a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2023;67:101782.
12. Graham LM, Kafka JM, AbiNader MA, Lawler SM, Gover-Chamlou AN, Messing JT, Moracco KE. Intimate partner violence-related fatalities among US youth aged 0-24 years, 2014-2018.Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(4):529-37.
13. United Nations. Goals 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. 2015. Retrieved from
14. Ahinkorah BO.Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan africa: evidence from 16 cross-sectional demographic and health surveys. SSM-Population Health.2021;13:100729.
Conroy AA. Gender, power, and intimate partner violence: a study on couples from rural Malawi. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(5):866-88.
Caldwell JC, Caldwell P, Orubuloye IO. The family and sexual networking in sub-Saharan africa: ancient regional differences and present-dayPatafio B, Miller P, Walker A, Coomber K, Curtis A, Karantzas G, mayshak R, Taylor N, Hyder S. Coercive controlling behaviors and reporting physical intimate partner violence in Australian women: an exploration. Violence against Women. 2022;28(2):375-94.
Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholarlookup?&title=Coercive%20controlling%20behaviors%20and%20reporting%20physical%20intimate%20partner%20violence%20in%20Australian%20women%3A%20an%20exploration&journal=Violence%20against%20Women&volume=28&issue=2&pages=375-94&publicationyear=2022&author=Patafio%2CB&author=Miller%2CP&author=Walker%2CA&author=Coomber%2CK&author=Curtis%2CA&author=Karantzas%2CG&author=mayshak%2CR&author=Taylor%2CN&author=Hyder%2CS
Kwagala B, Wandera SO, Ndugga P, Kabagenyi A. Empowerment, partner’s behaviours and intimate partner physical violence among married women in Uganda. BMC public Health. 2013;13(1):1-10.
google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholarlookup?&title=Empowerment%2C%20partner%E2%80%99s%20behaviours%20and%20intimate%20partner%20physical%20violence%20among%20married%20women%20in%20Uganda&journal=BMC%20Public%20Health&volume=13&issue=1&pages=1-10&publicationyear=2013&author=Kwagala%2CB&author=Wandera%2CSO&author=Ndugga%2CP&author=Kabagenyi%2CAS, Trego M. Severity of lifetime physical intimate partner violence and controlling behavior in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Immigr Minor Health. 2022;24(6):1508-16.
McClintock HF, Trego ML, Wang EM. Controlling behavior and lifetime physical, sexual, and emotional violence in sub-saharan Africa. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(15-16):7776-801.
Krantz G, Vung ND. 2The role of controlling behaviour in intimate partner violence and its health effects: a population based study from rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):1-0.ICF International. Demographic and health survey sampling and household listing manual. Maryland, U.S.A.: ICF International.: MEASURE DHS, Calverton; 2012.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Strobe Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-9.
Aboagye RG, Okyere J, Seidu AA, Hagan JE, Ahinkorah BO. Experience of intimate partner violence among women in sexual unions: is supportive attitude of women towards intimate partner violence a correlate?? HeDi Leo G, Sardanelli F. Statistical meaning: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics-reasons for a Conservative approach. Eur Radiol Experimental. 2020;4:1-8.
Google Scholar
Nzokirishaka A, Palamuleni M. Prevalence and determinants of intimate partner violence against women in burundi: evidence from 2016-17 demographic and health survey. J Gynecol Reproductive Med. 2023;7(2):91-104.
Google Scholar
Olayanju L, Naguib RN, Nguyen QT, Bali RK, Vung ND. Combating intimate partner violence in africa: opportunities and challenges in five African countries. Aggress Violent Beh. 2013;18(1):101-12.Jewkes R, Fulu E, Tabassam Naved R, Chirwa E, Dunkle K, Haardörfer R, Garcia-Moreno C, UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence study Team. Women’s and men’s reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women’s risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific. PLoS Med.2017;14(9):e1002381.
Bukuluki P, Kisaakye P, Wandiembe SP, Musuya T, Letiyo E, Bazira D. An examination of physical violence against women and its justification in development settings in Uganda. plos ONE. 2021;16(9):e0255281.Karakurt G, Silver KE. emotional abuse in intimate relationships: the role of gender and age. Violence Vict. 2013;28(5):804-21.Serrano-Montilla C, lozano LM, Bender M, Padilla JL. Individual and societal risk factors of attitudes justifying intimate partner violence against women: a multilevel cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e037993.
Akar T, Aksakal FN, Demirel B, Durukan E, Özkan S. Prevalence of domestic violence against women among a group of women: Ankara, Turkey: domestic violence against women in Ankara. J Family Violence.2010;25:449-60.Kennedy AC, prock KA. I still feel like I am not normal: A review of the role of stigma and stigmatization among female survivors of child sexual abuse, sexual assault, and intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence abuse. 2018;19(5):512-27.
Mukherjee R, Joshi RK. Controlling behavior and intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study in an urban area of delhi, India. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(19-20):NP10831-42.
Antai D. Controlling behavior,power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria.BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-511.
Table of Contents
Young women in south Africa face disproportionately high rates of HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Understanding the complex factors contributing to sexual risk-taking behaviors within this demographic is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies. This analysis explores the multifaceted challenges experienced by young women with multiple sexual partners residing in peri-urban settings,drawing on research examining socio-economic factors,relationship dynamics,and individual vulnerabilities.
The Landscape of Sexual Health in South Africa
South Africa continues to grapple with a meaningful HIV/AIDS epidemic. According to UNAIDS, an estimated 37.8 million people globally were living with HIV in 2023, with South Africa accounting for a considerable portion of these cases . While national HIV prevalence has stabilized in recent years, young women aged 15-24 remain particularly vulnerable, experiencing rates significantly higher than those of their male counterparts. This disparity is compounded by factors such as poverty, gender inequality, and limited access to comprehensive sexual health education and services. recent statistics from Statistics South Africa indicate that unemployment among youth (15-24 years) is around 63.9% in the first quarter of 2024, creating economic vulnerabilities that can influence risk-taking behaviors.
socio-Economic Determinants of Risk
Socio-economic factors play a pivotal role in shaping sexual behaviors. Research consistently demonstrates a correlation between lower socio-economic status and increased risk of STIs and unintended pregnancies [[1]], [[2]]. Young women facing economic hardship may engage in transactional sex – exchanging sexual favors for money, goods, or services – as a survival strategy. This dynamic creates a power imbalance and increases vulnerability to both STIs and gender-based violence. Furthermore, limited educational opportunities and lack of access to employment restrict agency and contribute to a cycle of poverty and vulnerability. For example, a study by Wilson (2019) highlights the strong link between socio-economic status and intimate partner violence, a factor often intertwined with risky sexual behaviors [[58]].
Relationship Dynamics and Partner Multiplicity
The context of relationships significantly influences sexual risk. young women may navigate complex relationship dynamics characterized by power imbalances, coercion, and a lack of open communication about sexual health.Multiple concurrent partnerships are often driven by a combination of factors, including the search for economic security, emotional fulfillment, or social status. however, each additional partner exponentially increases the risk of STI transmission. The prevalence of intergenerational relationships – where young women are involved with older men – is also a concern, as these relationships often involve unequal power dynamics and limited negotiation of safer sex practices. Instead of viewing partner multiplicity solely as a behavioral choice, it’s crucial to understand it as a response to broader structural inequalities and vulnerabilities.
Individual Vulnerabilities and protective Factors
Beyond socio-economic and relational factors, individual vulnerabilities contribute to risk. These include low self-esteem, limited knowledge about sexual health, substance abuse, and experiences of trauma. Conversely, protective factors – such as strong social support networks, access to education, and assertive communication skills – can mitigate risk. Empowering young women with comprehensive sexual health education that addresses gender norms, consent, and healthy relationship dynamics is essential. Furthermore, providing access to affordable contraception, STI testing and treatment, and psychosocial support services can significantly reduce vulnerability.
Moving Forward: A Holistic Approach
Addressing the challenges faced by young women with multiple sexual partners in South African peri-urban communities requires a holistic and multi-sectoral approach. This includes:
Economic Empowerment: Investing in education,skills development,and employment opportunities to reduce economic vulnerability.
gender Equality: Challenging harmful gender norms and promoting women’s rights and agency.
Comprehensive Sexual Health Education: Providing age-appropriate and culturally sensitive education on sexual health, consent, and healthy relationships.
Accessible healthcare: Ensuring access to affordable contraception, STI testing and treatment, and psychosocial support services.
* Community-Based Interventions: Engaging communities in addressing the social determinants of health and promoting positive behavioral change.
by addressing the underlying structural inequalities and empowering young women
Understanding and Addressing Controlling behavior & Intimate Partner Violence in Sub-saharan African Women
Meta Title: Ending Intimate Partner Violence: Understanding Controlling Behavior in sub-Saharan Africa
Meta Description: explore the dynamics of controlling behavior and intimate partner violence (IPV) affecting women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Learn about its impact, cultural contexts, and strategies for empowerment and safety.
Understanding Controlling Behavior
Controlling behavior,in its essence,is about exerting undue influence and dominance over another person’s life.While the term can appear in different contexts, including management functions like ensuring work is done efficiently and organizational goals are achieved [[1]], in the interpersonal realm, it signifies a pattern of actions designed to manipulate and dominate a partner. This can manifest in various ways, often escalating to the more severe and harmful experience of intimate partner violence (IPV). Merriam-Webster defines controlling as being “inclined to control others’ behavior : domineering” [[2]]. When this inclination is directed towards a romantic partner by making them feel trapped, isolated, or fearful, it crosses a critical line.
The impact of controlling behavior on women in Sub-Saharan Africa is a important concern, intertwined with complex socio-cultural norms and economic realities.These behaviors, while not exclusive to any region, often find fertile ground in societies where traditional gender roles are strongly upheld, and women’s autonomy may be historically limited. Understanding the nuances of controlling behavior is the first step towards dismantling the structures that perpetuate intimate partner violence.
Forms of Controlling Behavior
Controlling behavior is rarely a singular action; it’s a tapestry of tactics aimed at diminishing a partner’s self-worth and independence.Recognizing these tactics is crucial for identification and intervention.
- Isolation: A controlling partner frequently enough seeks to isolate their victim from friends, family, and support networks. This can involve constant criticism of loved ones, fabricating reasons why contact should cease, or even issuing threats if the victim attempts to maintain these relationships. By severing these connections, the abuser ensures the victim has fewer external resources and feels more dependent on them.
- Emotional Manipulation: This includes gaslighting (making the victim question their sanity or perception of reality),guilt-tripping,humiliation,public shaming,and constant criticism. The goal is to erode the victim’s self-esteem and make them believe they are inadequate or deserving of the mistreatment.
- Financial Control: Withholding money, controlling access to funds, demanding an account of every penny spent, or preventing the victim from working or pursuing education are common tactics. This financial stranglehold makes it incredibly difficult for the victim to leave the abusive relationship, as they lack the means to support themselves.
- Surveillance and monitoring: A controlling partner may constantly check phone calls and messages,track the victim’s movements,or demand to know their whereabouts at all times. This possessiveness stems from a need to exert complete oversight and prevent any perceived disloyalty or independence.
- Threats and Intimidation: This can range from verbal threats of harm (to the victim, children, or pets) to subtle displays of aggression, such as smashing objects or slamming doors. These actions create an atmosphere of fear and anxiety, making the victim constantly vigilant and afraid of provoking the partner.
- Stalking: In some instances, controlling behavior can escalate to stalking, where the abuser persistently follows, monitors, or harasses the victim even after the relationship has ended or when they are in public spaces, demonstrating a pervasive need for control.
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Complex Landscape
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a pervasive global issue, and Sub-Saharan Africa is no exception.The problem is exacerbated by a confluence of factors, including deeply ingrained patriarchal norms, poverty, political instability, and limited access to resources and support services for women. IPV encompasses a range of abusive behaviors by an intimate partner, including physical, sexual, emotional, and economic abuse, all of which are forms of controlling behavior aimed at subjugating the victim.
The definition of controlling as a primary goal-oriented function of management [[3]], where actual performance is compared to set standards to ensure adherence to plans and take corrective action [[3]], starkly contrasts with the destructive nature of controlling behavior within intimate relationships. In