Three Possible Verdicts in Law Professor’s Murder Trial

by Daniel Perez - News Editor
0 comments

Law Professor Faces Murder Trial After Fatal Shooting on Farm

A Dublin judge has issued a key charge to a jury regarding the case of Diarmuid Phelan, a professor of law accused of murdering 36-year-old Keith ‘Bono’ Conlon. The prosecution alleges that Phelan intentionally shot Conlon during an encounter on his farm, while the defense argues the death was an accident.

The Tragic Encounter

On February 24th, 2022, three men, including Conlon, were trespassing on Phelan’s wooded land while hunting. According to Phelan’s account, he fired his Winchester rifle at a loose dog on his property, causing three men to emerge from the woods and threaten him. He claims to have ascended a bank in an attempt to escape, but feeling threatened, fired three shots from his Smith & Wesson revolver. Tragically, Conlon was struck in the back of the head.

State’s Case: Intentional Killing

The prosecution asserts that two of the three shots were fired into the air, while the fatal third shot was directed at Conlon, who had turned away to leave. They argue that Phelan possessed the intent to kill or seriously injure Conlon at the time of the shooting.

Defense: Unintentional Accident

Confidently, Phelan’s legal team contends that the death was an accident. They claim Phelan fired "warning shots" and that the combined movement of Conlon, Phelan’s positioning, and the repetitive firing under pressure led to the unintended outcome.

Judge’s Charge: Self-Defense and Intent

In her charge to the jury, Ms Justice Siobhan Lankford outlined two crucial considerations. Firstly, they must determine if Phelan’s actions amounted to an intentional killing or a tragic accident. Secondly, they must assess whether Phelan’s actions fell under the legal category of self-defense.

The judge highlighted that for a murder conviction, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Phelan intended to kill or cause serious injury. If the jury finds an opportunity for reasonable doubt on this point, they cannot convict Phelan of murder.

Lankford also emphasized the complex issue of self-defense, clarifying that it’s permissible to use force if an individual genuinely believes it’s necessary to protect themselves from harm. However, this force must be proportionate to the perceived threat.

The jury’s decision will determine the fate of Law Professor Diarmuid Phelan and offer closure to the tragic death of Keith Conlon.

(Continue reading the judge’s charge and follow the developments in this compelling case.)

Related Posts

Leave a Comment