Trump’s Pursuit of Legacy: Monuments, Theology, and the Remaking of America
Donald Trump’s presidency has defied easy categorization, marked by a unique approach to power and a relentless focus on legacy. Rather than traditional policy implementation, his second term has centered on reshaping American institutions and public spaces to cement his place in history. This strategy, encompassing both the cultivation of a devoted political movement and a series of ambitious architectural projects, represents a systematic effort to transcend the limitations of institutional time and ensure a lasting impact on the nation’s identity.
A Dual Strategy: Political Theology and Material Inscription
Trump’s approach can be understood through two interconnected dimensions. First, the “MAGA” movement functions as a form of political theology, fostering a direct loyalty to the leader that bypasses traditional institutions. This creates a base of support independent of established political structures. Second, a series of initiatives – mandating neoclassical federal buildings, renaming institutions, and seeking to have his name prominently displayed on public works – attempts to engrave his legacy in stone, referencing historical displays of imperial power.
This dual strategy reflects a deep distrust of institutions to preserve his legacy. Trump appears to believe that without proactive measures, his contributions will be erased or reversed by future administrations. As he stated regarding the Kennedy Center, he intends to transform what he deems a “tired, broken and dilapidated centre” into “a world-class bastion of arts, music, far better than it has ever been before.” Reuters reported on this reshaping of US historical and cultural institutions on March 25, 2026.
The King’s Two Bodies: A Historical Perspective
This pursuit of enduring legacy touches upon a fundamental tension in political authority, as identified by Ernst Kantorowicz in his 1957 work, The King’s Two Bodies. Rulers possess both a mortal body and a symbolic “body politic” that aspires to permanence. Traditionally, monarchies resolved this through succession – “The King is dead, long live the King” – ensuring the continuity of the office even as the individual perished.
Democratic systems, in theory, address this through depersonalization, aiming for an office that is immortal by design and independent of any individual holder. But, leaders still grapple with the knowledge that their decisions can be overturned and their achievements forgotten. Trump’s actions suggest a rejection of this institutional immortality, driven by a belief that traditional channels are unreliable for preserving his legacy.
Breaking with Tradition: Trump’s Architectural Directives
Unlike presidents who built careers within established party structures, Trump operates outside traditional Republican machinery. His relationship with Congress, the federal bureaucracy, and the judiciary has been confrontational, leading him to seek alternative strategies for ensuring his lasting impact. This is evident in his architectural directives, including the mandate for neoclassical federal buildings and the pursuit of having his name added to prominent landmarks.
In January 2025, Trump issued a presidential memorandum titled ‘Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture’ and followed with an executive order in August 2025, ‘Making Federal Architecture Beautiful Again’, mandating classical architectural styles for federal buildings. He also announced plans for a grand ballroom at the White House and publicly expressed interest in constructing a triumphal arch in Washington and being added to Mount Rushmore.
Renaming and Reclaiming: A Symbolic Battle
The renaming of institutions has become a central component of this strategy. In December 2025, a board appointed by Trump voted to rename the Kennedy Center “The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Centre for the Performing Arts,” placing his name before Kennedy’s. He subsequently announced a two-year closure for “Construction, Revitalisation, and Complete Rebuilding.” He also sought to rename Penn Station in Modern York and Dulles International Airport in Washington after himself, offering to release federal funding for the Gateway tunnel project in exchange for this concession, a move that was ultimately rejected. The New York Times detailed this offer in February 2026.
MAGA as Political Theology
Beyond material projects, the MAGA movement serves as a powerful force for perpetuating Trump’s legacy. It functions as a political theology, grounding authority in personal loyalty and a shared narrative of national restoration. This movement, however, faces the challenge of surviving beyond Trump’s individual presence, as its coherence is deeply tied to his specific persona and grievances.
A Constitutional Collision
Trump’s approach represents a collision between his monumental ambitions and the stewardship ethic embedded in the American constitutional structure. The Constitution prioritizes the office over the individual, emphasizing institutional continuity and the separation of powers. Trump’s efforts to fuse his personal legacy with the symbols of the nation challenge this foundational principle.
As trust in institutions erodes, the temptation to pursue more direct and visible forms of legacy-building may grow. The tension between stewardship and monumentalism will likely persist, raising fundamental questions about the nature of power, the preservation of history, and the future of American democracy.
References
- De Bèze, T. (2010/1574). The law of magistrates. Droz bookstore.
- Elias, N. (1983/1969).The Court Society. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Kantorowicz, E. (1957). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology.
- Hotman, F., & Giesey, R. E. (2010/1573). Francogallia. Cambridge University Press.
- Languet, H. (1579).Revenge against tyrants: or, From the prince to the people, and the people to the prince, by legitimate power.
- Lefort, C., & Macey, D. (1988). Democracy and political theory. Polity Press.
- Machiavelli, N. (1993). The prince (1513). Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.
- Schmitt, C. (2005/1922). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.
- Zanker, P. (1988). The power of images in the age of Augustus. University of Michigan Press.
Keep reading